↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KRS267+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:54:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.74s 6.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  135 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  146 (  64   ~;  52   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  131 (   0 sgn 113   !;  18   ?;  31   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( model(X2,X0)
         => model(X2,X1) )
    <=> status(X0,X1,thm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ? [X2] : model(X2,X0)
    <=> status(X0,X1,cax) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',cax) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
        & ~ ? [X2] : model(X2,X0) )
    <=> status(X0,X1,tca) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',tca) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2,X3] :
          ( status(X2,X3,X1)
          & status(X2,X3,X0) )
    <=> mighta(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',mighta) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] : model(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',tautology) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] : ~ model(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',contradiction) ).

fof(f33,conjecture,
    mighta(tca,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mighta_tca_thm) ).

fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ mighta(tca,thm),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ~ mighta(tca,thm),
    inference(flattening,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2,X3] :
          ( status(X2,X3,X1)
          & status(X2,X3,X0) )
     => mighta(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( ~ model(X2,X0)
          | model(X2,X1) )
    <=> status(X0,X1,thm) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0)
    <=> status(X0,X1,cax) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
        & ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) )
    <=> status(X0,X1,tca) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ~ status(X2,X3,X1)
          | ~ status(X2,X3,X0) )
      | mighta(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X2] :
            ( model(X2,X0)
            & ~ model(X2,X1) )
        | status(X0,X1,thm) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,thm)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ model(X2,X0)
            | model(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X3] :
            ( model(X3,X0)
            & ~ model(X3,X1) )
        | status(X0,X1,thm) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,thm)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ model(X2,X0)
            | model(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( model(sK9(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ model(sK9(X0,X1),X1) )
        | status(X0,X1,thm) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,thm)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ model(X2,X0)
            | model(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9]),skolemize(X3,sK9(X0,X1))],[f63]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X2] : model(X2,X0)
        | status(X0,X1,cax) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,cax)
        | ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X0)
        | status(X0,X1,cax) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,cax)
        | ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( model(sK28(X0),X0)
        | status(X0,X1,cax) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,cax)
        | ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK28]),skolemize(X3,sK28(X0))],[f93]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X3] : ~ model(X3,X1)
        | ? [X2] : model(X2,X0)
        | status(X0,X1,tca) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
        | ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X3] : ~ model(X3,X1)
        | ? [X2] : model(X2,X0)
        | status(X0,X1,tca) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
        | ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f99]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X5] : ~ model(X5,X1)
        | ? [X4] : model(X4,X0)
        | status(X0,X1,tca) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
        | ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ model(sK32(X1),X1)
        | model(sK31(X0),X0)
        | status(X0,X1,tca) )
      & ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
        | ( ! [X3] : model(X3,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK31,sK32]),skolemize(X4,sK31(X0)),skolemize(X5,sK32(X1))],[f101]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X1] : model(X1,sK41),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK41]),skolemize(X0,sK41)],[f27]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ model(X1,sK45),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK45]),skolemize(X0,sK45)],[f29]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( model(sK9(X0,X1),X0)
      | status(X0,X1,thm) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( model(sK28(X0),X0)
      | status(X0,X1,cax) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ status(X0,X1,cax)
      | ~ model(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ model(sK32(X1),X1)
      | model(sK31(X0),X0)
      | status(X0,X1,tca) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
      | ~ model(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ status(X2,X3,X1)
      | ~ status(X2,X3,X0)
      | mighta(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ! [X1] : model(X1,sK41),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ model(X1,sK45),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ~ mighta(tca,thm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( status(X0,X1,thm)
      | model(sK9(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ model(X2,X0)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,cax) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f177]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( status(X0,X1,cax)
      | model(sK28(X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ model(X2,X0)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,tca) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( status(X1,X0,tca)
      | model(sK31(X1),X1)
      | ~ model(sK32(X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

tcf(c_122,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( mighta(X3,X2)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f199]) ).

tcf(c_127,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : model(X0,sK41),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).

tcf(c_130,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ model(X0,sK45),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f207]) ).

tcf(c_142,negated_conjecture,
    ~ mighta(tca,thm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).

tcf(c_974,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,thm) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_142]) ).

tcf(c_1020,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
      | ~ status(X0,X1,thm) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_974]) ).

tcf(c_1891,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ status(X0,X1,tca)
      | ~ model(sK28(X0),X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_104]) ).

tcf(c_3350,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( status(X0,sK41,tca)
      | model(sK31(X0),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_106]) ).

tcf(c_3448,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( model(sK28(X1),X1)
      | ~ model(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_3541,plain,
    status(sK45,sK41,tca),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3350,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_3628,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( status(X0,X1,thm)
      | model(sK28(X0),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_3448]) ).

tcf(c_7854,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ status(X0,X1,tca),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1020,c_974,c_1891,c_3628]) ).

tcf(c_7857,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3541,c_7854]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS267+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:52:54 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/5.42  
% 0.12/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/5.42  
% 0.12/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/5.43  % Proving...
% 1.74/6.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/6.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.74/6.18  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.74/6.18  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Proving...
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % 
% 1.74/6.18  % clauses                               91
% 1.74/6.18  % conjectures                           0
% 1.74/6.18  % EPR                                   39
% 1.74/6.18  % Horn                                  72
% 1.74/6.18  % unary                                 13
% 1.74/6.18  % binary                                47
% 1.74/6.18  % lits                                  220
% 1.74/6.18  % lits eq                               0
% 1.74/6.18  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.74/6.18  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.74/6.18  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.74/6.18  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.74/6.18  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ 
% 1.74/6.18  % Current options:
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % ------ Proving...
% 1.74/6.18  % 
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.74/6.18  
% 1.74/6.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------