↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT005-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 18.53s 4.16s
% Output   : Refutation 18.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  39 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  42 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  166 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &; 160   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0   ^;  46   !;   0   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(join_decl,type,
    join: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(r2_decl,type,
    r2: $i ).

thf(meet_decl,type,
    meet: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(n1_decl,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(n0_decl,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(r1_decl,type,
    r1: $i ).

thf(b2_decl,type,
    b2: $i ).

thf(a2_decl,type,
    a2: $i ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_meet_1) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_meet_0) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ join ) @ ( B @ meet ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
       != A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modular) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ join ) @ ( B @ meet ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
       != A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_join_0) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ meet ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ meet ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_join) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_join_1) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r2 @ meet ) )
    = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_complement_meet_a_b_2) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r2 @ meet ) )
    = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( b2 @ ( a2 @ meet ) )
   != r1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_SAMs_lemma) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( ( b2 @ ( a2 @ meet ) )
   != r1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_join) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( r2 @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = b2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',define_b2) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( r2 @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = b2 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r2 @ join ) )
    = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_complement_meet_a_b_1) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ meet ) @ ( r2 @ join ) )
    = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ meet ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ meet ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ join ) @ ( r1 @ meet ) )
    = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r1_complement_join_a_b_2) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ join ) @ ( r1 @ meet ) )
    = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ join ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r1_complement_join_a_b_1) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( ( b @ ( a @ join ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( r2 @ ( b @ meet ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = a2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',define_a2) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( r2 @ ( b @ meet ) @ ( r1 @ join ) )
    = a2 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3074,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,52,46,60,54,48,50,58,36,42,24,25,38,21,22,44,27,40,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT005-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.41  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:55:06 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.68/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.92/0.84  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (110ms). 
% 0.92/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.47/1.06  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.47/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.47/1.11  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 13 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.75/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 13 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.75/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.75/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.75/1.15  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 18.53/4.15  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 18.53/4.15  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 18.53/4.16  % Time passed: 3648ms (effective reasoning time: 3304ms)
% 18.53/4.16  % Axioms used in derivation (13): commutativity_of_join, associativity_of_meet, commutativity_of_meet, x_join_0, x_meet_1, associativity_of_join, idempotence_of_meet, x_meet_0, absorption1, x_join_1, modular, idempotence_of_join, absorption2
% 18.53/4.16  % No. of inferences in proof: 41
% 18.53/4.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3648 ms resp. 3304 ms w/o parsing
% 18.53/4.20  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 18.53/4.20  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------