↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : LAT013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:05:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.90s 2.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   64 (  64 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (  63 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  158 (  46 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mckenzie2,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X2,join(X1,X3))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie2) ).

cnf(mckenzie1,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie1) ).

cnf(mckenzie4,axiom,
    meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie4) ).

cnf(mckenzie3,axiom,
    join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie3) ).

cnf(prove_associativity_of_meet,negated_conjecture,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(a,meet(b,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X2,join(X1,X3))) = X1,
    mckenzie2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = X1,
    mckenzie1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    mckenzie4 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X2) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    mckenzie3 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),X2) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    meet(join(X1,X2),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_5]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X1) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,join(meet(X2,X1),X3)),meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    meet(join(X1,join(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),X1) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    join(X1,meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    meet(join(join(X1,X2),X3),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(meet(meet(X1,X2),X3),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(join(X1,meet(join(X2,X1),X3)),join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    meet(join(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)) = meet(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(meet(X1,X2),X3))) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)) = join(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(join(X1,meet(X2,X3)),join(X3,X1)) = join(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    meet(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,meet(X2,X1))) = meet(X3,meet(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X3,X1))) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(join(X3,X1),X2)) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X3,X2))) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(join(X3,X2),X1)) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X3,X2))) = meet(X1,join(X3,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_41]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_13]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,X1))) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(join(X1,join(X2,X3)),X2) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(meet(X3,X1),X2)) = meet(meet(X3,X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_8]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X2)) = meet(X3,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(meet(X1,X3),X2)) = meet(meet(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_13]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(a,meet(b,c)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_associativity_of_meet]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    meet(join(X1,X2),meet(X3,X2)) = meet(X3,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)) = meet(meet(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,X3)) = meet(meet(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(a,meet(b,c)),
    c_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,meet(X3,meet(X1,X4)))) = meet(X2,meet(X3,meet(X1,X4))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(join(X2,X1),X3)) = meet(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    meet(join(X1,X2),meet(X3,meet(X2,X4))) = meet(X3,meet(X2,X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_54]),c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    meet(c,meet(a,b)) != meet(a,meet(b,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,meet(X3,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59]),c_0_60]),c_0_60]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_28]),c_0_62]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LAT013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:06:43 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.90/2.24  % Version: 3.5.1
% 11.90/2.24  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.90/2.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 249712 completed with status 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 11.90/2.24  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.90/2.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.90/2.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.90/2.24  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 11.90/2.24  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with pid 249717 completed with status 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Result found by E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 11.90/2.24  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.90/2.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.90/2.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.90/2.24  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 11.90/2.24  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Starting E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 11.90/2.24  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 11.90/2.24  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.90/2.24  
% 11.90/2.24  % Proof found!
% 11.90/2.24  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.90/2.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.90/2.24  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 11.90/2.24  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 11.90/2.24  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 11.90/2.24  % Processed clauses                    : 2127
% 11.90/2.24  % ...of these trivial                  : 812
% 11.90/2.24  % ...subsumed                          : 974
% 11.90/2.24  % ...remaining for further processing  : 341
% 11.90/2.24  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Backward-rewritten                   : 148
% 11.90/2.24  % Generated clauses                    : 113132
% 11.90/2.24  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55138
% 11.90/2.24  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Paramodulations                      : 113132
% 11.90/2.24  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % NegExts                              : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Total rewrite steps                  : 89422
% 11.90/2.24  % ...of those cached                   : 68996
% 11.90/2.24  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 11.90/2.24  % Current number of processed clauses  : 188
% 11.90/2.24  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 185
% 11.90/2.24  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 11.90/2.24  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 11.90/2.24  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52313
% 11.90/2.24  % ...number of literals in the above   : 52313
% 11.90/2.24  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Current number of archived clauses   : 153
% 11.90/2.24  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% 11.90/2.24  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1496
% 11.90/2.24  % BW rewrite match successes           : 468
% 11.90/2.24  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 11.90/2.24  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1022897
% 11.90/2.24  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 11.90/2.24  
% 11.90/2.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.90/2.24  % User time                : 1.412 s
% 11.90/2.24  % System time              : 0.061 s
% 11.90/2.24  % Total time               : 1.473 s
% 11.90/2.24  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 11.90/2.24  
% 11.90/2.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.90/2.24  % User time                : 7.516 s
% 11.90/2.24  % System time              : 0.290 s
% 11.90/2.24  % Total time               : 7.805 s
% 11.90/2.24  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 11.90/2.24  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------