%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : LAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:29:07 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.40s 11.63s
% Output : Refutation 11.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 30 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_absorbtion,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,join(a,b)) != a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_absorbtion) ).
cnf(transitivity,axiom,
( X7 != X6
| X6 != X8
| X7 = X8 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(mckenzie2,axiom,
meet(X16,join(X15,join(X16,X17))) = X16,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie2) ).
cnf(c7,plain,
( X83 != meet(X80,join(X81,join(X80,X82)))
| X83 = X80 ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[mckenzie2,transitivity]) ).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
X2 = X2,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c1,axiom,
( X59 != X60
| X58 != X57
| meet(X59,X58) = meet(X60,X57) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(symmetry,axiom,
( X4 != X3
| X3 = X4 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(mckenzie1,axiom,
join(X11,meet(X10,meet(X11,X12))) = X11,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie1) ).
cnf(c6,plain,
X18 = join(X18,meet(X19,meet(X18,X20))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[mckenzie1,symmetry]) ).
cnf(c0,axiom,
( X44 != X45
| X43 != X42
| join(X44,X43) = join(X45,X42) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c29,plain,
( X50 != X51
| join(X50,X49) = join(X51,X49) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c44,plain,
join(X108,X106) = join(join(X108,meet(X107,meet(X108,X109))),X106),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c29,c6]) ).
cnf(mckenzie3,axiom,
join(join(meet(X28,X27),meet(X27,X29)),X27) = X27,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie3) ).
cnf(c13,plain,
( X113 != join(join(meet(X110,X111),meet(X111,X112)),X111)
| X113 = X111 ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[mckenzie3,transitivity]) ).
cnf(c130,plain,
join(meet(X115,X116),X116) = X116,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c13,c44]) ).
cnf(c148,plain,
X117 = join(meet(X118,X117),X117),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c130,symmetry]) ).
cnf(c153,plain,
( X1414 != X1415
| meet(X1414,X1416) = meet(X1415,join(meet(X1417,X1416),X1416)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c148,c1]) ).
cnf(c15978,plain,
meet(X2192,X2191) = meet(X2192,join(meet(X2193,X2191),X2191)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c153,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c26411,plain,
meet(X2194,join(X2194,X2195)) = X2194,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c15978,c7]) ).
cnf(c26472,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26411,prove_absorbtion]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : LAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed May 8 12:47:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 11.40/11.63 % Version: 1.5
% 11.40/11.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.40/11.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.40/11.63
% 11.40/11.63 % Initial clauses : 10
% 11.40/11.63 % Processed clauses : 531
% 11.40/11.63 % Factors computed : 3
% 11.40/11.63 % Resolvents computed: 26711
% 11.40/11.63 % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 11.40/11.63 % Forward subsumed : 541
% 11.40/11.63 % Backward subsumed : 1
% 11.40/11.63 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 11.40/11.63 % User time : 11.220 s
% 11.40/11.63 % System time : 0.047 s
% 11.40/11.63 % Total time : 11.267 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------