↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.05s 2.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   84 (  84 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  216 (  83 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   95 (   0 sgn  95   !;   0   ?;  81   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT005-0.ax',idempotence_of_join) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT005-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT005-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(join(X0,X1),join(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT005-0.ax',wal_1) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT005-0.ax',wal_2) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X0,X2))) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    join(join(a,b),c) != join(a,join(b,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity_of_join) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(join(X0,X1),join(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    join(join(a,b),c) != join(a,join(b,c)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_92,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = join(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_93,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = join(iPr_def_10,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_94,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = join(b,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_95,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = join(a,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_94,c_95,c_92,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_97,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(join(X0,X1),join(X2,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

tcf(c_153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(join(X1,X0),join(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(meet(X1,X0),meet(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_173,plain,
    join(c,b) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_175,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(join(X0,X1),X2)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_178,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,iPr_def_10)) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_179,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(b,join(X0,iPr_def_12)) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_181,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_183,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_10,join(X0,iPr_def_11)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_184,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,iPr_def_13)) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(c,meet(join(X0,c),iPr_def_12)) = c,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_208,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(join(X1,X0),join(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_211,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,meet(join(X0,iPr_def_12),iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_229,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_248,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,meet(iPr_def_13,join(X0,iPr_def_12))) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_211,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_252,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(c,meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,c))) = c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_329,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(X0,iPr_def_10),join(meet(X1,join(X0,iPr_def_10)),a)) = join(X0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_333,plain,
    meet(b,iPr_def_13) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_179]) ).

tcf(c_336,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_183]) ).

tcf(c_345,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(X0,iPr_def_13),join(meet(X1,join(X0,iPr_def_13)),a)) = join(X0,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_184,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_348,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_229]) ).

tcf(c_387,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(c,join(iPr_def_12,X0)) = c,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_176]) ).

tcf(c_395,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(join(X1,X0),X2)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_181]) ).

tcf(c_398,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(b,join(X0,iPr_def_10)) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_181]) ).

tcf(c_430,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_175,c_248]) ).

tcf(c_457,plain,
    meet(c,meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11)) = c,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_252]) ).

tcf(c_538,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(b,meet(join(X0,b),iPr_def_12)) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_208]) ).

tcf(c_617,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_430,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_620,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_336,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_621,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_13,b) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_626,plain,
    meet(c,meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)) = c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_457,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_637,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(b,meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,b))) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_538,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_668,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(X0,iPr_def_13),join(a,meet(X1,join(X0,iPr_def_13)))) = join(X0,iPr_def_13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_345,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_671,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(X0,iPr_def_10),join(a,meet(X1,join(X0,iPr_def_10)))) = join(X0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_1183,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_617,c_348]) ).

tcf(c_1188,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_620,c_348]) ).

tcf(c_1189,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_621,c_348]) ).

tcf(c_1326,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(iPr_def_12,X0),join(meet(X1,join(iPr_def_12,X0)),c)) = join(iPr_def_12,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_1355,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),join(meet(X0,meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)),c)) = meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_626,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_1404,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),join(c,meet(X0,meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)))) = meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1355,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_1410,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(iPr_def_12,X0),join(c,meet(X1,join(iPr_def_12,X0)))) = join(iPr_def_12,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1326,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_1722,plain,
    meet(b,iPr_def_11) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1188,c_398]) ).

tcf(c_1731,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(b,join(iPr_def_13,X0)) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1189,c_395]) ).

tcf(c_1761,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_11,b) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1722,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_2211,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,b) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1761,c_348]) ).

tcf(c_2556,plain,
    meet(b,meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11)) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2211,c_637]) ).

tcf(c_2839,plain,
    meet(b,meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2556,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_5484,plain,
    join(join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_13),join(a,b)) = join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1731,c_668]) ).

tcf(c_5688,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5484,c_101,c_92]) ).

tcf(c_5779,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_10,join(X0,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5688,c_181]) ).

tcf(c_8013,plain,
    join(meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),join(c,b)) = meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2839,c_1404]) ).

tcf(c_8082,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8013,c_99,c_173,c_229]) ).

tcf(c_8500,plain,
    join(join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),join(c,iPr_def_10)) = join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5779,c_1410]) ).

tcf(c_8637,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8082,c_348]) ).

tcf(c_8713,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8500,c_99,c_93,c_1183]) ).

tcf(c_8848,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,join(iPr_def_11,X0)) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8637,c_395]) ).

tcf(c_9505,plain,
    join(join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),join(a,iPr_def_12)) = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8848,c_671]) ).

tcf(c_9815,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_9505,c_99,c_95,c_1188,c_8713]) ).

tcf(c_9816,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9815,c_96]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:03:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 5.05/2.72  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 5.05/2.72  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 5.05/2.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------  iProver source info
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 5.05/2.72  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 5.05/2.72  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Proving...
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % 
% 5.05/2.72  % clauses                               12
% 5.05/2.72  % conjectures                           1
% 5.05/2.72  % EPR                                   1
% 5.05/2.72  % Horn                                  12
% 5.05/2.72  % unary                                 12
% 5.05/2.72  % binary                                0
% 5.05/2.72  % lits                                  12
% 5.05/2.72  % lits eq                               12
% 5.05/2.72  % fd_pure                               0
% 5.05/2.72  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 5.05/2.72  % fd_cond                               0
% 5.05/2.72  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 5.05/2.72  % AC symbols                            0
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ 
% 5.05/2.72  % Current options:
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % ------ Proving...
% 5.05/2.72  % 
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.05/2.72  
% 5.05/2.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------