%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : LAT033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:48:35 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.39s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.14 % Problem : LAT033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0. % 0.04/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 08:47:37 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.21/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.21/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.21/0.39 # % 0.21/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.21/0.39 # Number of axioms: 7 Number of unprocessed: 7 % 0.21/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.21/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.21/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.21/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.21/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.21/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.21/0.39 # 7 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.21/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.21/0.39 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.21/0.39 # Found 7 unit axioms. % 0.21/0.39 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.21/0.39 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.21/0.39 # 7 unit axiom clauses % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.21/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.21/0.39 # Creating equality axioms % 0.21/0.39 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.21/0.39 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.21/0.39 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (join(xx,xx)!=xx)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.21/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.21/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X6,meet(X6,X9))=X6), inference(start_rule)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(X6,meet(X6,X9))=X6), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (join(X4,meet(X4,X2))!=X4), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (meet(join(X4,meet(X4,X2)),join(X6,meet(X6,X9)))=meet(X4,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (meet(X4,X6)!=join(meet(X4,X6),meet(meet(X4,X6),X2))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (meet(join(X4,meet(X4,X2)),join(X6,meet(X6,X9)))=join(meet(X4,X6),meet(meet(X4,X6),X2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_47, ...])). % 0.21/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.21/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (join(xx,xx)!=xx)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.21/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.21/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X4,meet(X4,X7))=X4), inference(start_rule)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(X4,meet(X4,X7))=X4), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (join(X6,meet(X6,X2))!=X6), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (meet(join(X4,meet(X4,X7)),join(X6,meet(X6,X2)))=meet(X4,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (meet(X4,X6)!=join(meet(X4,X6),meet(meet(X4,X6),X2))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (meet(join(X4,meet(X4,X7)),join(X6,meet(X6,X2)))=join(meet(X4,X6),meet(meet(X4,X6),X2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_47, ...])). % 0.21/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.21/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (join(xx,xx)!=xx)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.21/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.21/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(meet(X7,X2),meet(meet(X7,X2),X13))=meet(X7,X2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(meet(X7,X2),meet(meet(X7,X2),X13))=meet(X7,X2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (join(X7,meet(X7,X2))!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (join(join(X7,meet(X7,X2)),join(meet(X7,X2),meet(meet(X7,X2),X13)))=join(X7,meet(X7,X2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (join(X7,meet(X7,X2))!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (join(join(X7,meet(X7,X2)),join(meet(X7,X2),meet(meet(X7,X2),X13)))=X7), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_47, ...])). % 0.21/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.21/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.21/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.21/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (join(xx,xx)!=xx)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.21/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.21/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(xx,meet(xx,xx))=xx), inference(start_rule)). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(xx,meet(xx,xx))=xx), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (join(xx,xx)=xx), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (join(xx,xx)!=join(xx,meet(xx,xx))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (xx!=join(xx,meet(xx,xx))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.21/0.39 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (join(xx,xx)!=xx), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_48, ...])). % 0.21/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.21/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.21/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.21/0.39 # Child (14899) has found a proof. % 0.21/0.39 % 0.21/0.39 # Proof search is over... % 0.21/0.39 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------