↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT035-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.50s 3.48s
% Output   : Refutation 5.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  37 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  44 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  190 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &; 180   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0   ^;  58   !;   0   ?;  58   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(f_decl,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

thf(k_decl,type,
    k: $i > $i ).

thf(join_decl,type,
    join: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(aa_decl,type,
    aa: $i ).

thf(bb_decl,type,
    bb: $i ).

thf(n0_decl,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(meet_decl,type,
    meet: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n1_decl,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ( ( n1 @ k )
    = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_top) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ( ( n1 @ k )
    = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ( ( n0 @ k )
    = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_bottom) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ( ( n0 @ k )
    = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_join) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ join ) @ ( B @ meet ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
       != A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modular) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ join ) @ ( B @ meet ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
       != A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ f )
      = ( B @ f @ ( A @ f @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_meet) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ f )
      = ( B @ f @ ( A @ f @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_meet_0) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_join_0) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( n0 @ k @ f )
     != n0 )
    | ( ( bb @ ( aa @ join ) @ k @ f )
     != ( bb @ k @ f @ ( aa @ k @ f @ join ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comp_join_hemimorphism) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( ( n0 @ k @ f )
     != n0 )
    | ( ( bb @ ( aa @ join ) @ k @ f )
     != ( bb @ k @ f @ ( aa @ k @ f @ join ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ meet ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ meet ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ k )
      = ( B @ k @ ( A @ k @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_meet) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ k )
      = ( B @ k @ ( A @ k @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_join_1) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ join ) )
      = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ k )
      = ( B @ k @ ( A @ k @ meet ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_join) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ k )
      = ( B @ k @ ( A @ k @ meet ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_join) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ join ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_meet_1) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ( ( n1 @ f )
    = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_top) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ( ( n1 @ f )
    = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ ( A @ meet ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ meet ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ meet ) @ meet ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[61,53,48,50,42,24,46,57,21,28,38,32,34,44,59,40,26,55,36,30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LAT035-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.23/0.49  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.23/0.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.23/0.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.23/0.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.23/0.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.23/0.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.23/0.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.23/0.49  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:58:21 UTC 2026
% 0.23/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.50  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.39/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.87/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (281ms). 
% 1.87/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.85/2.27  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.85/2.28  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.21/2.42  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.39/2.51  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 19 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.39/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.39/2.56  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.39/2.57  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.50/3.47  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.50/3.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.50/3.47  % Time passed: 2762ms (effective reasoning time: 1808ms)
% 5.50/3.47  % Axioms used in derivation (19): f_on_top, commutativity_of_join, associativity_of_meet, k_on_top, commutativity_of_meet, k_on_meet, x_meet_1, associativity_of_join, idempotence_of_meet, x_meet_0, absorption1, x_join_1, modular, f_on_meet, k_on_join, idempotence_of_join, absorption2, k_on_bottom, x_join_0
% 5.50/3.47  % No. of inferences in proof: 41
% 5.50/3.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2762 ms resp. 1808 ms w/o parsing
% 5.82/3.55  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.82/3.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------