↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT038-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.93s 2.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   78 (  78 unt;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  206 (  77 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (   0 sgn  93   !;   0   ?;  72   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dist_join) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dist_meet) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : f(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(f(X0,X2),f(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_left_join) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    f(join(aa,bb),dd) = f(join(cc,bb),dd),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lhs1) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    meet(f(aa,dd),f(bb,dd)) = meet(f(cc,dd),f(bb,dd)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lhs2) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    f(aa,dd) != f(cc,dd),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rhs) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)) = join(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)) = meet(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(f(X0,X1),f(X2,X1)) = f(join(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    f(join(aa,bb),dd) = f(join(cc,bb),dd),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    meet(f(aa,dd),f(bb,dd)) = meet(f(cc,dd),f(bb,dd)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    f(aa,dd) != f(cc,dd),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_136,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f(aa,dd),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_137,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f(cc,dd),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_138,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f(bb,dd),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_139,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = meet(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_140,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_141,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = join(aa,bb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_142,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = f(iPr_def_15,dd),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_143,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = join(cc,bb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = f(iPr_def_17,dd),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_137,c_136]) ).

tcf(c_146,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_149,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_140,c_138,c_139]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    iPr_def_16 = iPr_def_18,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_143,c_144,c_141,c_142]) ).

tcf(c_159,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(f(X0,X1),f(X2,X1)) = f(join(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_160,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)) = meet(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).

tcf(c_161,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)) = join(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_247,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_248,plain,
    f(iPr_def_17,dd) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_249,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,meet(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,join(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_260,plain,
    join(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_373,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,meet(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_398,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,f(X0,dd)) = f(join(bb,X0),dd),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_159]) ).

tcf(c_440,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_10,join(iPr_def_12,X0)) = join(iPr_def_13,meet(iPr_def_10,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_160]) ).

tcf(c_441,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_12,X0)) = join(iPr_def_13,meet(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_160]) ).

tcf(c_567,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_1055,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_373]) ).

tcf(c_1056,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_373]) ).

tcf(c_1827,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,join(meet(X0,iPr_def_13),X1)) = join(iPr_def_10,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1055,c_146]) ).

tcf(c_1830,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,join(X0,meet(X1,iPr_def_13))) = join(X0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1055,c_250]) ).

tcf(c_1858,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(meet(X0,iPr_def_13),X1)) = join(iPr_def_11,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1056,c_146]) ).

tcf(c_1861,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(X0,meet(X1,iPr_def_13))) = join(X0,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1056,c_250]) ).

tcf(c_8278,plain,
    f(join(bb,aa),dd) = join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_398]) ).

tcf(c_8280,plain,
    f(join(bb,cc),dd) = join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_398]) ).

tcf(c_8312,plain,
    f(join(cc,bb),dd) = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8280,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_8313,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8312,c_143,c_248]) ).

tcf(c_8314,plain,
    f(join(aa,bb),dd) = join(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8278,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_8315,plain,
    join(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8314,c_141,c_142]) ).

tcf(c_8459,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(join(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_16) = join(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8313,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_8476,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(join(iPr_def_10,X0),iPr_def_16) = join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8315,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_8738,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_10,X0)) = join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8476,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_8739,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_11,X0)) = join(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8459,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_25313,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,join(iPr_def_13,X1))) = join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_1827]) ).

tcf(c_26265,plain,
    join(iPr_def_10,meet(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13))) = join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_441,c_1830]) ).

tcf(c_26387,plain,
    join(iPr_def_10,meet(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12))) = join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_26265,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_26388,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_26387,c_148,c_567,c_8738,c_25313]) ).

tcf(c_26712,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,join(iPr_def_13,X1))) = join(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_1858]) ).

tcf(c_27403,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,meet(iPr_def_10,join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13))) = join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_440,c_1861]) ).

tcf(c_27542,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,meet(iPr_def_10,join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12))) = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_27403,c_147,c_149,c_146,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_27543,plain,
    iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_27542,c_261,c_8739,c_26712,c_26388]) ).

tcf(c_27544,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27543,c_145]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT038-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:04:06 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.41  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.43  % Proving...
% 11.93/2.70  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 11.93/2.70  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 11.93/2.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------  iProver source info
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 11.93/2.70  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 11.93/2.70  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Proving...
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % 
% 11.93/2.70  % clauses                               26
% 11.93/2.70  % conjectures                           1
% 11.93/2.70  % EPR                                   3
% 11.93/2.70  % Horn                                  26
% 11.93/2.70  % unary                                 26
% 11.93/2.70  % binary                                0
% 11.93/2.70  % lits                                  26
% 11.93/2.70  % lits eq                               26
% 11.93/2.70  % fd_pure                               0
% 11.93/2.70  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 11.93/2.70  % fd_cond                               0
% 11.93/2.70  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 11.93/2.70  % AC symbols                            2
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ 
% 11.93/2.70  % Current options:
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % ------ Proving...
% 11.93/2.70  % 
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.93/2.70  
% 11.93/2.70  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------