%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT040-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:05:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 30 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 29 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption2,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).
cnf(lhs2,hypothesis,
meet(xx,yy) = meet(xx,zz),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lhs2) ).
cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(dist_meet,hypothesis,
meet(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dist_meet) ).
cnf(lhs1,hypothesis,
join(xx,yy) = join(xx,zz),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lhs1) ).
cnf(rhs,negated_conjecture,
yy != zz,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rhs) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
meet(xx,yy) = meet(xx,zz),
lhs2 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
join(yy,meet(xx,zz)) = yy,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
associativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
meet(xx,meet(zz,yy)) = meet(xx,zz),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
meet(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,X3)),
dist_meet ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
join(meet(xx,zz),meet(zz,yy)) = meet(zz,yy),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,join(X1,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
join(xx,yy) = join(xx,zz),
lhs1 ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)) = meet(X1,join(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
meet(zz,yy) = zz,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
yy != zz,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rhs]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
meet(yy,join(xx,zz)) = yy,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
meet(yy,join(X1,zz)) = join(zz,meet(yy,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
yy != zz,
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_10]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT040-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:09:30 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2817611 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.47 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2817618 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.47 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.14/0.47 % Processed clauses : 428
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 190
% 0.14/0.47 % ...subsumed : 106
% 0.14/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 132
% 0.14/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.14/0.47 % Generated clauses : 5505
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3126
% 0.14/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Paramodulations : 5505
% 0.14/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 7098
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of those cached : 4942
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 90
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2718
% 0.14/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 2718
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 0.14/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.14/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 366
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 196
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 55331
% 0.14/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.030 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 3380 pages
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.138 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.153 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------