%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : LAT043-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.98s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 107 ( 107 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 223 ( 106 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 104 ( 0 sgn 104 !; 0 ?; 83 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : meet(X0,X0) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',idempotence_of_meet) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',idempotence_of_join) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0] : join(complement(X0),X0) = n1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',invertability1) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0] : meet(complement(X0),X0) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',invertability2) ).
fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
complement(join(c,d)) != meet(complement(c),complement(d)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compatability_law) ).
tcf(c_62,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(X0,X0) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_63,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_65,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_66,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_67,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tcf(c_68,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_69,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tcf(c_70,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)) = meet(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tcf(c_71,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(complement(X0),X0) = n1,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tcf(c_72,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(complement(X0),X0) = n0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tcf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
meet(complement(c),complement(d)) != complement(join(c,d)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
tcf(c_118,definition,
iPr_def_10 = complement(c),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_119,definition,
iPr_def_11 = complement(d),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_120,definition,
iPr_def_12 = meet(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_121,definition,
iPr_def_13 = join(c,d),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_122,definition,
iPr_def_14 = complement(iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_123,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_121,c_122,c_119,c_118,c_120]) ).
tcf(c_124,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).
tcf(c_125,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).
tcf(c_126,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).
tcf(c_127,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).
tcf(c_128,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).
tcf(c_129,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).
tcf(c_130,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).
tcf(c_131,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(X0,X0) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
tcf(c_133,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(complement(X0),X0) = n0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).
tcf(c_134,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(complement(X0),X0) = n1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).
tcf(c_135,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)) = meet(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).
tcf(c_203,plain,
meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_12,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_204,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(X0,complement(X0)) = n1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_205,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(X0,complement(X0)) = n0,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_206,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,join(X0,X2)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_126]) ).
tcf(c_207,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,meet(X0,X2)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_221,plain,
join(c,iPr_def_10) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_204]) ).
tcf(c_222,plain,
join(d,iPr_def_11) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_204]) ).
tcf(c_223,plain,
join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_204]) ).
tcf(c_225,plain,
meet(c,iPr_def_10) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_205]) ).
tcf(c_226,plain,
meet(d,iPr_def_11) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_205]) ).
tcf(c_227,plain,
meet(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_205]) ).
tcf(c_230,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_128]) ).
tcf(c_232,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(X0,n0) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_205,c_128]) ).
tcf(c_237,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_129]) ).
tcf(c_238,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(X0,n1) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_129]) ).
tcf(c_244,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X0,X1)) = join(X0,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_124]) ).
tcf(c_257,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = meet(X0,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_125]) ).
tcf(c_259,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_11,meet(iPr_def_10,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_125]) ).
tcf(c_275,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(c,join(X0,d)) = join(X0,iPr_def_13),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_206]) ).
tcf(c_295,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_11,meet(X0,iPr_def_10)) = meet(X0,iPr_def_12),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_207]) ).
tcf(c_330,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13) = n0,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_227,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_331,plain,
meet(iPr_def_11,d) = n0,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_332,plain,
meet(iPr_def_10,c) = n0,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_333,plain,
join(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13) = n1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_334,plain,
join(iPr_def_11,d) = n1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_335,plain,
join(iPr_def_10,c) = n1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_221,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_552,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n0,X0) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_232,c_126]) ).
tcf(c_574,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n0,meet(iPr_def_14,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_14,join(iPr_def_13,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_330,c_135]) ).
tcf(c_577,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_14,X0),n0) = meet(iPr_def_14,join(X0,iPr_def_13)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_330,c_135]) ).
tcf(c_581,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_11,meet(d,X0)) = meet(n0,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_125]) ).
tcf(c_601,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,join(c,X0)) = join(n1,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_124]) ).
tcf(c_615,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n1,X0) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_238,c_230]) ).
tcf(c_639,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(n0,X0) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_232,c_237]) ).
tcf(c_673,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(X0,n1) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_244]) ).
tcf(c_701,plain,
meet(iPr_def_11,n0) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_257]) ).
tcf(c_721,plain,
meet(iPr_def_11,n0) = meet(iPr_def_12,c),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_259]) ).
tcf(c_738,plain,
join(c,n1) = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_275]) ).
tcf(c_800,plain,
join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13) = n1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_738,c_673]) ).
tcf(c_807,plain,
meet(iPr_def_12,c) = n0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_721,c_701]) ).
tcf(c_829,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,join(c,X0)) = n1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_601,c_615]) ).
tcf(c_837,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_11,meet(d,X0)) = n0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_581,c_639]) ).
tcf(c_854,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n0,meet(iPr_def_14,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_14,join(X0,iPr_def_13)),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_577,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_855,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_14,join(X0,iPr_def_13)) = meet(iPr_def_14,X0),
inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_854,c_232,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_856,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_14,join(iPr_def_13,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_14,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_574,c_552]) ).
tcf(c_1487,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n0,meet(iPr_def_12,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_12,join(c,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_807,c_135]) ).
tcf(c_1604,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,join(c,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1487,c_552]) ).
tcf(c_1845,plain,
join(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13) = n1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_829]) ).
tcf(c_1892,plain,
join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10) = n1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1845,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_2999,plain,
meet(d,iPr_def_12) = n0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_837,c_295]) ).
tcf(c_3243,plain,
meet(iPr_def_12,d) = n0,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2999,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_3466,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_12,X0),n0) = meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,d)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3243,c_135]) ).
tcf(c_3563,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,n1) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_800,c_855]) ).
tcf(c_3592,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,n1) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_10),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1892,c_856]) ).
tcf(c_3612,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3592,c_238]) ).
tcf(c_3613,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3563,c_238]) ).
tcf(c_3635,plain,
! [X0: $i] : join(n0,meet(iPr_def_12,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,d)),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3466,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_3636,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,d)) = meet(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3635,c_552]) ).
tcf(c_3760,plain,
meet(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3612,c_295]) ).
tcf(c_3987,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3760,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_3988,plain,
meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3987,c_3613]) ).
tcf(c_4502,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,d)) = meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,iPr_def_13)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_1604]) ).
tcf(c_4704,plain,
! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_12,join(X0,iPr_def_13)) = meet(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4502,c_3636]) ).
tcf(c_18093,plain,
meet(iPr_def_12,n1) = meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_4704]) ).
tcf(c_18420,plain,
meet(iPr_def_12,n1) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_18093,c_124,c_126,c_125,c_127]) ).
tcf(c_18421,plain,
iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_18420,c_238,c_3988]) ).
tcf(c_18422,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18421,c_123]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT043-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.75 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.75 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.75 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.75 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.75 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.75 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.75 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.75 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:10:13 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.75 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.75 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.78 Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.10/0.78 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.80
% 0.10/0.80 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.80
% 0.14/0.80 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.81 % Proving...
% 8.98/2.44 WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 8.98/2.44 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.98/2.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ iProver source info
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.98/2.44 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.98/2.44 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Proving...
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Problem Properties
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 %
% 8.98/2.44 % clauses 18
% 8.98/2.44 % conjectures 1
% 8.98/2.44 % EPR 1
% 8.98/2.44 % Horn 18
% 8.98/2.44 % unary 18
% 8.98/2.44 % binary 0
% 8.98/2.44 % lits 18
% 8.98/2.44 % lits eq 18
% 8.98/2.44 % fd_pure 0
% 8.98/2.44 % fd_pseudo 0
% 8.98/2.44 % fd_cond 0
% 8.98/2.44 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 8.98/2.44 % AC symbols 2
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------
% 8.98/2.44 % Current options:
% 8.98/2.44 % ------
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 %
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % ------ Proving...
% 8.98/2.44 %
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.98/2.44
% 8.98/2.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.98/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------