↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 05:59:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   60 (  59 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
    meet(X,join(X,Y)) = X ).

cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(X,Y) = meet(Y,X) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(X,Y) = join(Y,X) ).

cnf(invertability1,axiom,
    join(complement(X),X) = n1 ).

cnf(modular_law,axiom,
    join(X,meet(Y,join(X,Z))) = meet(join(X,Y),join(X,Z)) ).

cnf(prove_orthomodular_law,negated_conjecture,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) != join(a,b) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = meet(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),join(X_51,X_53)),
    inference(subst,[],[modular_law:[bind(X,$fot(X_51)),bind(Y,$fot(complement(X_51))),bind(Z,$fot(X_53))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( join(X,Y) != join(Y,X)
    | join(Y,X) = join(X,Y) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(X0,$fot(join(X,Y))),bind(Y0,$fot(join(Y,X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    join(Y,X) = join(X,Y),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(X,Y),join(Y,X)) )],[commutativity_of_join,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    join(complement(X),X) = join(X,complement(X)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(Y,$fot(complement(X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( join(complement(X),X) != join(X,complement(X))
    | join(complement(X),X) != n1
    | join(X,complement(X)) = n1 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(join(complement(X),X),n1) ),[0],$fot(join(X,complement(X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( join(complement(X),X) != n1
    | join(X,complement(X)) = n1 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(complement(X),X),join(X,complement(X))) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    join(X,complement(X)) = n1,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(complement(X),X),n1) )],[invertability1,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    join(X_51,complement(X_51)) = n1,
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X,$fot(X_51))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( join(X_51,complement(X_51)) != n1
    | join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) != meet(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),join(X_51,X_53))
    | join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))),meet(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),join(X_51,X_53))) ),[1,0],$fot(n1)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) != meet(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),join(X_51,X_53))
    | join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),n1) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))),meet(join(X_51,complement(X_51)),join(X_51,X_53))) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    meet(X,join(X,complement(X))) = X,
    inference(subst,[],[absorption1:[bind(Y,$fot(complement(X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( join(X,complement(X)) != n1
    | meet(X,join(X,complement(X))) != X
    | meet(X,n1) = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(meet(X,join(X,complement(X))),X) ),[0,1],$fot(n1)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    ( meet(X,join(X,complement(X))) != X
    | meet(X,n1) = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(X,complement(X)),n1) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    meet(X,n1) = X,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(meet(X,join(X,complement(X))),X) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_16]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    meet(X,n1) = meet(n1,X),
    inference(subst,[],[commutativity_of_meet:[bind(Y,$fot(n1))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( meet(X,n1) != X
    | meet(X,n1) != meet(n1,X)
    | meet(n1,X) = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(meet(X,n1),X) ),[0],$fot(meet(n1,X))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( meet(X,n1) != X
    | meet(n1,X) = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(meet(X,n1),meet(n1,X)) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    meet(n1,X) = X,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(meet(X,n1),X) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_20]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)) = join(X_51,X_53),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_21:[bind(X,$fot(join(X_51,X_53)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) != meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53))
    | meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)) != join(X_51,X_53)
    | join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = join(X_51,X_53) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))),join(X_51,X_53)) ),[0],$fot(meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) != meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53))
    | join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = join(X_51,X_53) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53)),join(X_51,X_53)) )],[refute_0_22,refute_0_23]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))) = join(X_51,X_53),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(X_51,meet(complement(X_51),join(X_51,X_53))),meet(n1,join(X_51,X_53))) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) = join(a,b),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_25:[bind(X_51,$fot(a)),bind(X_53,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    ( join(a,b) != join(a,b)
    | join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) != join(a,b)
    | join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) = join(a,b) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))),join(a,b)) ),[0,1,1],$fot(join(a,b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    ( join(a,b) != join(a,b)
    | join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) = join(a,b) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))),join(a,b)) )],[refute_0_26,refute_0_27]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    join(a,b) != join(a,b),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))),join(a,b)) )],[refute_0_28,prove_orthomodular_law]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    join(a,b) = join(a,b),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(join(a,b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(join(a,b),join(a,b)) )],[refute_0_30,refute_0_29]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 21:08:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------