↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:42:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  33 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  32 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c1,negated_conjecture,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) != join(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_orthomodular_law) ).

cnf(c2,axiom,
    join(X,Y) = join(Y,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    join(a,b) = join(b,a),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c2]) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    meet(complement(a),join(a,b)) = meet(complement(a),join(b,a)),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).

cnf(c5,plain,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) = join(a,meet(complement(a),join(b,a))),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c4]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    join(X3,X2) = join(X2,X3),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c2]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    join(X2,X3) = join(X3,X2),
    inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[c6]) ).

cnf(c8,plain,
    meet(X4,join(X2,X3)) = meet(X4,join(X3,X2)),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c7]) ).

cnf(c9,plain,
    join(X4,meet(X3,join(X2,X4))) = join(X4,meet(X3,join(X4,X2))),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c8]) ).

cnf(c10,axiom,
    join(X2,meet(Y2,join(X2,Z))) = meet(join(X2,Y2),join(X2,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modular_law) ).

cnf(c11,plain,
    join(X4,meet(X3,join(X4,X2))) = meet(join(X4,X3),join(X4,X2)),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c10]) ).

cnf(c12,plain,
    join(X4,meet(X3,join(X2,X4))) = meet(join(X4,X3),join(X4,X2)),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c9,c11]) ).

cnf(c13,plain,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(b,a))) = meet(join(a,complement(a)),join(a,b)),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c12]) ).

cnf(c14,plain,
    join(complement(X2),X2) = join(X2,complement(X2)),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c2]) ).

cnf(c15,plain,
    join(X2,complement(X2)) = join(complement(X2),X2),
    inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[c14]) ).

cnf(c16,axiom,
    join(complement(X2),X2) = n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',step) ).

cnf(c17,plain,
    join(X2,complement(X2)) = n1,
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c15,c16]) ).

cnf(c18,plain,
    join(a,complement(a)) = n1,
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c17]) ).

cnf(c19,plain,
    meet(join(a,complement(a)),join(a,b)) = meet(n1,join(a,b)),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c18]) ).

cnf(c20,axiom,
    meet(X2,Y2) = meet(Y2,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(c21,plain,
    meet(X2,n1) = meet(n1,X2),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c20]) ).

cnf(c22,plain,
    meet(n1,X2) = meet(X2,n1),
    inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[c21]) ).

cnf(c23,plain,
    n1 = join(X2,complement(X2)),
    inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[c17]) ).

cnf(c24,plain,
    meet(X2,n1) = meet(X2,join(X2,complement(X2))),
    inference(congruence,[status(thm)],[c23]) ).

cnf(c25,axiom,
    meet(X2,join(X2,Y2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).

cnf(c26,plain,
    meet(X2,join(X2,complement(X2))) = X2,
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c25]) ).

cnf(c27,plain,
    meet(X2,n1) = X2,
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c24,c26]) ).

cnf(c28,plain,
    meet(n1,X2) = X2,
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c22,c27]) ).

cnf(c29,plain,
    meet(n1,join(a,b)) = join(a,b),
    inference(substitution,[status(thm)],[c28]) ).

cnf(c30,plain,
    meet(join(a,complement(a)),join(a,b)) = join(a,b),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c19,c29]) ).

cnf(c31,plain,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(b,a))) = join(a,b),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c13,c30]) ).

cnf(c32,plain,
    join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))) = join(a,b),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[c5,c31]) ).

cnf(c33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1,c32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 14:00:41 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.50  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.12/0.50  
% 0.12/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.50  
% 0.12/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.63/0.51  
% 0.63/0.51  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------