%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LAT045-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Bw0bxOTGJ9 true
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:41:01 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : LAT045-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Bw0bxOTGJ9 true
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 14:28:08 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.32 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.32 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.32 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.32 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.32 % Running in FO mode
% 0.47/0.57 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.47/0.57 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.47/0.57 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.47/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.47/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/0.72 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.47/0.72 % BCE start: 15
% 0.47/0.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.72 % PE start: 15
% 0.47/0.72 logic: eq
% 0.47/0.72 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.72 % done 38 iterations in 0.037s
% 0.47/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.47/0.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.72 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(join_type, type, join: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(meet_type, type, meet: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(complement_type, type, complement: $i > $i).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(prove_orthomodular_law, conjecture,
% 0.47/0.72 (( join @ a @ ( meet @ ( complement @ a ) @ ( join @ a @ b ) ) ) =
% 0.47/0.72 ( join @ a @ b ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.47/0.72 (( join @ a @ ( meet @ ( complement @ a ) @ ( join @ a @ b ) ) ) !=
% 0.47/0.72 ( join @ a @ b )),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_orthomodular_law])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (((join @ a @ (meet @ (complement @ a) @ (join @ a @ b)))
% 0.47/0.72 != (join @ a @ b))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(modular_law, axiom,
% 0.47/0.72 (( join @ X @ ( meet @ Y @ ( join @ X @ Z ) ) ) =
% 0.47/0.72 ( meet @ ( join @ X @ Y ) @ ( join @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.72 ((join @ X0 @ (meet @ X1 @ (join @ X0 @ X2)))
% 0.47/0.72 = (meet @ (join @ X0 @ X1) @ (join @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [modular_law])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(commutativity_of_meet, axiom, (( meet @ X @ Y ) = ( meet @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((meet @ X1 @ X0) = (meet @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_meet])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (((meet @ (join @ a @ b) @ (join @ a @ (complement @ a)))
% 0.47/0.72 != (join @ a @ b))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.47/0.72 [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(invertability3, axiom, (( complement @ ( complement @ X ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((complement @ (complement @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [invertability3])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(invertability1, axiom, (( join @ ( complement @ X ) @ X ) = ( n1 ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((join @ (complement @ X0) @ X0) = (n1))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [invertability1])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((join @ X0 @ (complement @ X0)) = (n1))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((complement @ (complement @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [invertability3])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((join @ (complement @ X0) @ X0) = (n1))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [invertability1])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(absorption1, axiom, (( meet @ X @ ( join @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((meet @ X0 @ (join @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [absorption1])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((meet @ (complement @ X0) @ n1) = (complement @ X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl138, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((meet @ X0 @ n1) = (complement @ (complement @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.47/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ((complement @ (complement @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [invertability3])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl142, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((meet @ X0 @ n1) = (X0))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl138, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl172, plain, (((join @ a @ b) != (join @ a @ b))),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.47/0.72 [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl142])).
% 0.47/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl173, plain, ($false),
% 0.47/0.72 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl172])).
% 0.47/0.72
% 0.47/0.72 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.72
% 0.47/0.72
% 0.47/0.72 % Terminating...
% 0.51/0.79 % Runner terminated.
% 0.51/0.81 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------