%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT088-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 12 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wal_absorbtion_4,axiom,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wal_absorbtion_4) ).
cnf(wal_absorbtion_5,axiom,
join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wal_absorbtion_5) ).
cnf(wal_absorbtion_1,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2))) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wal_absorbtion_1) ).
cnf(prove_normal_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,a) != a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_normal_axioms_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_4 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_5 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),X1),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2))) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,a) != a,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_normal_axioms_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
meet(meet(X1,meet(X1,X2)),meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,a) != a,
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
meet(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT088-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:12:00 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % sh5l with pid 2820895 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2820902 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Processed clauses : 19
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.14/0.47 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.14/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Generated clauses : 130
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 112
% 0.14/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Paramodulations : 130
% 0.14/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of those cached : 19
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97
% 0.14/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 97
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1336
% 0.14/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------