%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : LAT091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:48:53 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LAT091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 19:11:01 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.13/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.13/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.37 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.41 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.41 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.41 % 0.13/0.41 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.41 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (join(b,a)!=join(a,b))). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2)))=X2)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2)))=X1)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (join(meet(X1,X1),meet(X2,join(X1,X1)))=X1)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1)=X1)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1)=X1)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.41 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.41 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.41 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X5=X5), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X5=X5), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (join(meet(X1,X5),meet(X5,join(X1,X5)))!=X5), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (meet(X5,join(meet(X1,X5),meet(X5,join(X1,X5))))=meet(X5,X5)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (meet(X5,X5)!=join(meet(X1,meet(X5,X5)),meet(meet(X5,X5),join(X1,meet(X5,X5))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.41 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (meet(X5,join(meet(X1,X5),meet(X5,join(X1,X5))))=join(meet(X1,meet(X5,X5)),meet(meet(X5,X5),join(X1,meet(X5,X5))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])). % 0.13/0.41 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.41 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.41 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.41 # Child (9258) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.41 % 0.13/0.41 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.41 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------