↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT152-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 102.04s 22.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 102.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   81 (  81 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  179 (  80 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (   0 sgn  91   !;   0   ?;  73   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,meet(X2,join(X0,X1)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equation_H40) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))) != meet(a,join(meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),meet(c,join(a,b)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_H6) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,meet(X2,join(X0,X1)))))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),meet(c,join(a,b)))) != meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(meet(c,join(a,b)),meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))))) != meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_65,c_63,c_66,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_103,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = join(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_104,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = meet(c,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_105,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = meet(a,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_106,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = join(b,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_107,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = meet(a,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_108,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_109,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = meet(a,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_16 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_105,c_106,c_107,c_103,c_104,c_108,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_113,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_114,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,meet(X2,join(X0,X1)))))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,meet(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_185,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_186,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_13,a) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_187,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_15,a) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_188,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_10,c) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_189,plain,
    join(a,iPr_def_12) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_191,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_193,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_196,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,a) = a,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    meet(a,iPr_def_10) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_209,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_10,a) = a,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_213,plain,
    join(iPr_def_10,a) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X0) = meet(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_201]) ).

tcf(c_256,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_201]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X1) = join(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_191]) ).

tcf(c_276,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,X0)) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_278,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = meet(X0,X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_253,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(meet(X0,X1),X2)) = join(X0,X2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_394,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_14,X0)) = join(iPr_def_15,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_399,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,join(a,X0)) = join(a,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_400,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,join(a,X0)) = join(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_213,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_535,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(X0,iPr_def_14)) = join(iPr_def_15,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_394]) ).

tcf(c_902,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,join(X0,a)) = join(X0,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_399]) ).

tcf(c_990,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,a)) = join(iPr_def_10,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_191,c_400]) ).

tcf(c_1000,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,a)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_990,c_213]) ).

tcf(c_1021,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(meet(X0,a),iPr_def_10) = meet(X0,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1000,c_201]) ).

tcf(c_1024,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_10,meet(X0,a)) = meet(X0,a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1021,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_1105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,meet(c,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_12,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_1111,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_10,meet(c,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_188,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_1271,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(a,join(b,meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X0,iPr_def_10))))) = meet(a,join(b,meet(X0,join(a,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_3762,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13) = join(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_535]) ).

tcf(c_3783,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13) = join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3762,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_3822,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_15,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3783,c_201]) ).

tcf(c_3945,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_15,meet(X0,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13))) = meet(X0,iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3822,c_180]) ).

tcf(c_4785,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_12,X0),a) = join(iPr_def_12,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_902,c_392]) ).

tcf(c_4791,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(a,meet(iPr_def_12,X0)) = a,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4785,c_113,c_196]) ).

tcf(c_5713,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(meet(c,X0),meet(iPr_def_12,X0)) = meet(c,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1105,c_191]) ).

tcf(c_5719,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(meet(iPr_def_12,X0),meet(c,X0)) = meet(c,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5713,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_7657,plain,
    meet(c,a) = meet(iPr_def_11,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1111,c_1024]) ).

tcf(c_7658,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_11,a) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7657,c_114,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_7673,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_12,X0)) = join(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7658,c_392]) ).

tcf(c_26514,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,b) = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_7673]) ).

tcf(c_137782,plain,
    meet(a,join(b,meet(c,join(a,meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10))))) = meet(a,join(b,meet(c,meet(c,iPr_def_10)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5719,c_1271]) ).

tcf(c_137862,plain,
    meet(a,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_137782,c_114,c_113,c_105,c_185,c_186,c_188,c_278,c_4791,c_26514]) ).

tcf(c_140725,plain,
    meet(a,iPr_def_15) = meet(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137862,c_3945]) ).

tcf(c_140727,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_140725,c_114,c_187,c_256]) ).

tcf(c_140906,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_140727]) ).

tcf(c_140907,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_140906]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LAT152-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:23:49 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.48  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.16/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.52  % Proving...
% 102.04/22.53  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 102.04/22.53  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 102.04/22.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------  iProver source info
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 102.04/22.53  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 102.04/22.53  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Proving...
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % 
% 102.04/22.53  % clauses                               17
% 102.04/22.53  % conjectures                           1
% 102.04/22.53  % EPR                                   1
% 102.04/22.53  % Horn                                  17
% 102.04/22.53  % unary                                 17
% 102.04/22.53  % binary                                0
% 102.04/22.53  % lits                                  17
% 102.04/22.53  % lits eq                               17
% 102.04/22.53  % fd_pure                               0
% 102.04/22.53  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 102.04/22.53  % fd_cond                               0
% 102.04/22.53  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 102.04/22.53  % AC symbols                            2
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ 
% 102.04/22.53  % Current options:
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % ------ Proving...
% 102.04/22.53  % 
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 102.04/22.53  
% 102.04/22.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------