↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 125.95s 22.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 125.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  106 ( 106 unt;  14 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  277 ( 105 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   16 (  14 usr;  15 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   0 sgn  80   !;   0   ?;  61   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',idempotence_of_join) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X1,join(X3,meet(X0,X2)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equation_H42) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))) != meet(a,join(meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),meet(c,join(a,b)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_H6) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X1,join(X3,meet(X0,X2)))))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),meet(c,join(a,b)))) != meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(meet(c,join(a,b)),meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))))) != meet(a,join(b,meet(a,c))),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_65,c_63,c_66,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_103,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = join(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_104,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = meet(c,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_105,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = meet(a,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_106,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = join(b,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_107,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = meet(a,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_108,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_109,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = meet(a,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_16 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_105,c_106,c_107,c_103,c_104,c_108,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_111,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = meet(a,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_112,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = join(b,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_113,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = meet(a,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_114,definition,
    iPr_def_20 = join(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_20])],[]) ).

tcf(c_115,definition,
    iPr_def_21 = meet(c,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_21])],[]) ).

tcf(c_116,definition,
    iPr_def_22 = join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_22])],[]) ).

tcf(c_117,definition,
    iPr_def_23 = meet(a,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_23])],[]) ).

tcf(c_118,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_16 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_110]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_17,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_120,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_18,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_19,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_122,plain,
    iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_20,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_123,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_21,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    iPr_def_15 = iPr_def_22,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_125,plain,
    iPr_def_16 = iPr_def_23,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_117]) ).

tcf(c_126,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_127,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_128,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_129,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

tcf(c_130,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_131,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_132,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

tcf(c_134,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X1,join(X3,meet(X0,X2)))))) = meet(X0,join(X1,meet(X2,join(X0,X3)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_289,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_131]) ).

tcf(c_676,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_289]) ).

tcf(c_1201,plain,
    meet(a,c) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_1203,plain,
    join(b,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_120]) ).

tcf(c_1204,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1203,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1205,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,join(b,X0)) = join(iPr_def_13,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1204,c_126]) ).

tcf(c_1206,plain,
    meet(a,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_121]) ).

tcf(c_1207,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_13,a) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1206,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1208,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_13,meet(a,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_14,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1207,c_127]) ).

tcf(c_1209,plain,
    join(a,b) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_122]) ).

tcf(c_1211,plain,
    meet(c,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_123]) ).

tcf(c_1212,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_10,c) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1211,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1214,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_124]) ).

tcf(c_1215,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_11,join(iPr_def_14,X0)) = join(iPr_def_15,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1214,c_126]) ).

tcf(c_1216,plain,
    meet(a,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_125]) ).

tcf(c_1217,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_15,a) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1216,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1218,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_15,meet(a,X0)) = meet(iPr_def_16,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1217,c_127]) ).

tcf(c_1223,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,b) = join(iPr_def_13,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_1205]) ).

tcf(c_1224,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,join(X0,b)) = join(iPr_def_13,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_1205]) ).

tcf(c_1227,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1223,c_1204]) ).

tcf(c_1230,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_13,join(b,X0)) = join(iPr_def_13,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1227,c_126]) ).

tcf(c_1231,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = meet(iPr_def_14,c),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1201,c_1208]) ).

tcf(c_1234,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) = meet(iPr_def_14,c),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1231,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1251,plain,
    join(a,iPr_def_12) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1201,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_1253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_1257,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1207,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_1260,plain,
    join(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1217,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_1266,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,a) = a,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1251,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1277,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_131]) ).

tcf(c_1280,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1204,c_131]) ).

tcf(c_1295,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_14,c) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1234,c_1280]) ).

tcf(c_1319,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(X0,join(X1,iPr_def_12))))) = meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(a,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1201,c_134]) ).

tcf(c_1361,plain,
    join(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1295,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_1363,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1361,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1368,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_12,join(iPr_def_14,X0)) = join(iPr_def_14,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1363,c_126]) ).

tcf(c_1388,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1280,c_1253]) ).

tcf(c_1401,plain,
    join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1388,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_1434,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_16,join(X0,iPr_def_15)) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1260,c_676]) ).

tcf(c_1650,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1214,c_1277]) ).

tcf(c_1962,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_15,X0)) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_1434]) ).

tcf(c_6812,plain,
    join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = join(iPr_def_14,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1368,c_1224]) ).

tcf(c_6816,plain,
    join(iPr_def_14,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6812,c_1257]) ).

tcf(c_6836,plain,
    join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13) = join(iPr_def_15,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6816,c_1215]) ).

tcf(c_7332,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6836,c_1962]) ).

tcf(c_7530,plain,
    meet(a,join(iPr_def_13,meet(c,join(a,b)))) = meet(a,join(iPr_def_13,meet(c,join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1230,c_1319]) ).

tcf(c_7538,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(X0,iPr_def_12)))) = meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(a,iPr_def_12)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_1319]) ).

tcf(c_7571,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(X0,iPr_def_12)))) = meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(iPr_def_12,a)))),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_7538,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_7572,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : meet(a,join(X0,meet(c,join(X0,iPr_def_12)))) = meet(a,join(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7571,c_129,c_1201,c_1266]) ).

tcf(c_7582,plain,
    meet(a,join(iPr_def_13,meet(c,join(a,b)))) = meet(a,join(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7530,c_7572]) ).

tcf(c_7583,plain,
    meet(a,join(iPr_def_13,meet(c,join(a,b)))) = meet(a,join(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_7582,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_7584,plain,
    meet(a,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7583,c_129,c_128,c_1207,c_1209,c_1212,c_1401]) ).

tcf(c_7629,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = meet(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7584,c_1218]) ).

tcf(c_7632,plain,
    meet(iPr_def_16,join(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)) = meet(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_7629,c_126,c_128,c_127,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_7633,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7632,c_1650,c_7332]) ).

tcf(c_7856,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_7633]) ).

tcf(c_7858,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_7856]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:23:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 125.95/22.93  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 125.95/22.93  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 125.95/22.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------  iProver source info
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 125.95/22.93  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 125.95/22.93  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Proving...
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % 
% 125.95/22.93  % clauses                               24
% 125.95/22.93  % conjectures                           1
% 125.95/22.93  % EPR                                   8
% 125.95/22.93  % Horn                                  24
% 125.95/22.93  % unary                                 24
% 125.95/22.93  % binary                                0
% 125.95/22.93  % lits                                  24
% 125.95/22.93  % lits eq                               24
% 125.95/22.93  % fd_pure                               0
% 125.95/22.93  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 125.95/22.93  % fd_cond                               0
% 125.95/22.93  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 125.95/22.93  % AC symbols                            2
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ 
% 125.95/22.93  % Current options:
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % ------ Proving...
% 125.95/22.93  % 
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 125.95/22.93  
% 125.95/22.93  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------