↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT168-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.45s 16.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  34 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn  79   !;   0   ?;  62   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)) = join(X0,meet(join(X0,X1),meet(join(X0,X2),join(X1,meet(X0,X2))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equation_H18_dual) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,c)) != meet(a,join(b,meet(join(a,b),join(c,meet(a,b))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_H58) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,X1) = meet(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),X2) = meet(X0,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(join(X0,X1),meet(join(X0,X2),join(X1,meet(X0,X2))))) = meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,meet(join(a,b),join(c,meet(a,b))))) != meet(a,join(b,c)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_159,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_190,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(join(X0,X1),X2)) = meet(X0,X2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_194,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,meet(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_157]) ).

tcf(c_244,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(join(X0,X1),meet(join(X2,X0),join(X1,meet(X0,X2))))) = meet(join(X0,X1),join(X2,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_338,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_159]) ).

tcf(c_467,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(X1,meet(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_194]) ).

tcf(c_587,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(meet(X0,X1),join(X2,X0)) = meet(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_338]) ).

tcf(c_605,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : meet(X0,meet(X1,join(X2,X0))) = meet(X0,X1),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_587,c_66,c_64,c_65,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_832,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),meet(X0,X2)) = join(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_467]) ).

tcf(c_835,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,meet(X0,X2))) = join(X0,X1),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_832,c_66,c_64,c_65,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_2342,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(join(X0,meet(X1,X2)),meet(X3,join(X1,X0))) = meet(join(X0,meet(X1,X2)),X3),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_835,c_605]) ).

tcf(c_2370,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : meet(join(X0,X1),meet(X2,join(X1,meet(X0,X3)))) = meet(join(X1,meet(X0,X3)),X2),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2342,c_66,c_64,c_65,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_5451,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(join(X1,X0),join(X2,meet(X0,X1)))) = meet(join(X0,X2),join(X1,X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_244,c_63,c_2370]) ).

tcf(c_5494,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,meet(join(X1,X0),join(X2,meet(X1,X0)))) = meet(join(X0,X2),join(X1,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_5451]) ).

tcf(c_5650,plain,
    meet(a,meet(join(b,c),join(a,b))) != meet(a,join(b,c)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_5494]) ).

tcf(c_5651,plain,
    meet(a,meet(join(a,b),join(b,c))) != meet(a,join(b,c)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5650,c_66,c_64,c_65,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_5652,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_5651,c_190]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LAT168-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/15.43  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/15.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/15.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/15.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/15.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/15.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/15.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/15.43  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:27:09 UTC 2026
% 0.16/15.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/15.43  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/15.47  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.16/15.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/15.48  
% 0.16/15.48  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/15.48  
% 0.16/15.48  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/15.49  % Proving...
% 7.45/16.84  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 7.45/16.84  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.45/16.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.45/16.84  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.45/16.84  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Proving...
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % 
% 7.45/16.84  % clauses                               10
% 7.45/16.84  % conjectures                           1
% 7.45/16.84  % EPR                                   0
% 7.45/16.84  % Horn                                  10
% 7.45/16.84  % unary                                 10
% 7.45/16.84  % binary                                0
% 7.45/16.84  % lits                                  10
% 7.45/16.84  % lits eq                               10
% 7.45/16.84  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.45/16.84  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.45/16.84  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.45/16.84  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 7.45/16.84  % AC symbols                            2
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ 
% 7.45/16.84  % Current options:
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % ------ Proving...
% 7.45/16.84  % 
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.45/16.84  
% 7.45/16.84  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------