%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : LAT198-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:44:31 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 22.07s 3.29s
% Output : Proof 22.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LAT198-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 14:00:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 22.07/3.29 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 22.07/3.29
% 22.07/3.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 22.07/3.29
% 22.90/3.33 % SZS output start Proof
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 1 (idempotence_of_join): join(X, X) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join): join(X, Y) = join(Y, X).
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 3 (complement_join): join(X, complement(X)) = one.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet): meet(X, Y) = meet(Y, X).
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 5 (complement_meet): meet(X, complement(X)) = zero.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 7 (absorption2): join(X, meet(X, Y)) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 8 (associativity_of_join): join(join(X, Y), Z) = join(X, join(Y, Z)).
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 9 (absorption1): meet(X, join(X, Y)) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet): meet(meet(X, Y), Z) = meet(X, meet(Y, Z)).
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 11 (meet_join_complement): ifeq(join(X, Y), one, ifeq(meet(X, Y), zero, complement(X), Y), Y) = Y.
% 22.90/3.33 Axiom 12 (equation_H42): meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(X, W)))) = meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(Y, join(W, meet(X, Z)))))).
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 13: meet(X, one) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, one)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(X, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 14: join(X, zero) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, zero)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, meet(X, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 15: join(zero, X) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(zero, X)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, zero)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 14 }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 16: meet(X, zero) = zero.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, zero)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(zero, X)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(zero, meet(zero, X))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.33 zero
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 17: join(X, join(Y, complement(X))) = one.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, join(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, join(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(join(X, complement(X)), Y)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) }
% 22.90/3.33 join(one, Y)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(one, meet(Y, one))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 join(one, meet(one, Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.33 one
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 18: meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(X, Y)))) = meet(X, join(Y, meet(X, Z))).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(Y, X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(Y, join(X, meet(X, Z))))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 12 (equation_H42) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, join(X, X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 1 (idempotence_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, meet(X, Z)))
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 19: meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(X, Y))) = meet(X, join(Y, complement(X))).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, join(X, complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, one)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 13 }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 20: meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, X))) = meet(X, join(Y, complement(X))).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 19 }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 21: meet(X, complement(complement(X))) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, complement(complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(one, one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(join(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(join(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(X), complement(complement(X))), zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(join(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(X), join(complement(complement(X)), zero)), zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(join(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(X), join(complement(complement(X)), meet(X, complement(X)))), zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 20 }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, ifeq(join(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(X), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), zero, complement(complement(X)), join(X, complement(complement(X)))), join(X, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 11 (meet_join_complement) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(X, complement(complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 22: meet(X, meet(Y, complement(X))) = zero.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(meet(X, complement(X)), Y)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(zero, Y)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(Y, zero)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 16 }
% 22.90/3.33 zero
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 23: complement(complement(X)) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 complement(complement(X))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(one, one, complement(complement(X)), X)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, complement(X)), one, complement(complement(X)), X)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(X), X), one, complement(complement(X)), X)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 21 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(X), X), one, complement(complement(X)), meet(X, complement(complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 21 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(X), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, complement(complement(X)), meet(X, complement(complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(X), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(X)), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), meet(X, complement(complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 22 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(X), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(X), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), zero, complement(complement(X)), meet(X, complement(complement(X)))), meet(X, complement(complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 11 (meet_join_complement) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, complement(complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 21 }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 24: meet(X, join(Y, X)) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(Y, X))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, join(X, Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 25: join(X, meet(Y, X)) = X.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, meet(Y, X))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, meet(X, Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.33 X
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 26: meet(X, meet(Y, join(X, Z))) = meet(X, Y).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(Y, join(X, Z)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(join(X, Z), Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(meet(X, join(X, Z)), Y)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, Y)
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 27: meet(X, complement(join(X, Y))) = zero.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, complement(join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 26 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, meet(join(X, Y), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(X, zero)
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 16 }
% 22.90/3.33 zero
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 28: join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))) = complement(complement(join(X, Y))).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 11 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 20 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(join(X, Y)), join(complement(complement(join(X, Y))), meet(X, complement(join(X, Y))))), zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 27 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(join(X, Y)), join(complement(complement(join(X, Y))), zero)), zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 14 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(complement(join(X, Y)), complement(complement(join(X, Y)))), zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(complement(join(X, Y)), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 17 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(one, one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(zero, zero, complement(complement(join(X, Y))), join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.33 complement(complement(join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 29: join(X, join(complement(X), Y)) = one.
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, join(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(X, join(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 17 }
% 22.90/3.33 one
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 30: join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))) = complement(X).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 11 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(join(X, Y)), complement(X))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 19 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(X, complement(join(X, Y))))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 27 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), zero)), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 14 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(meet(X, complement(X)), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 29 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(one, one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.33 complement(X)
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 31: meet(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))) = complement(join(X, Y)).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 meet(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(complement(join(X, Y)), complement(X))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 30 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 meet(complement(join(X, Y)), join(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 24 }
% 22.90/3.33 complement(join(X, Y))
% 22.90/3.33
% 22.90/3.33 Lemma 32: join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(Y, X)))) = complement(X).
% 22.90/3.33 Proof:
% 22.90/3.33 join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(Y, X))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 11 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))), complement(X))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 19 R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(X, meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), meet(meet(X, Y), complement(meet(X, Y))))), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, join(complement(X), zero)), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by lemma 14 }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(meet(X, complement(X)), zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.33 = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 22.90/3.33 ifeq(join(X, join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 29 }
% 22.90/3.34 ifeq(one, one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y))))), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.34 ifeq(zero, zero, complement(X), join(complement(X), meet(Y, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 22.90/3.34 complement(X)
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 33: meet(complement(X), complement(meet(Y, X))) = complement(X).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), complement(meet(Y, X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), complement(meet(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 30 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), join(complement(meet(X, Y)), complement(join(meet(X, Y), X))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), join(complement(meet(X, Y)), complement(join(X, meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), join(complement(meet(X, Y)), complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(complement(X), join(complement(X), complement(meet(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.34 complement(X)
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 34: meet(X, complement(meet(X, Y))) = meet(X, complement(Y)).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, complement(meet(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(meet(X, complement(meet(X, Y))), join(complement(Y), meet(X, complement(meet(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 32 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(meet(X, complement(meet(X, Y))), complement(Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, meet(complement(meet(X, Y)), complement(Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, meet(complement(Y), complement(meet(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 33 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, complement(Y))
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 35: join(X, meet(Y, complement(X))) = join(X, Y).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, meet(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 complement(complement(join(X, meet(Y, complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 28 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(complement(join(X, meet(Y, complement(X))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 31 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(join(X, meet(Y, complement(X)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 34 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, meet(Y, complement(X))))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, meet(complement(X), Y)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, meet(Y, join(complement(X), X))))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, meet(Y, join(X, complement(X)))))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, meet(Y, one)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 13 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(meet(complement(X), join(X, Y))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 34 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(meet(complement(X), complement(join(X, Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 31 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, complement(complement(join(X, Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 28 }
% 22.90/3.34 complement(complement(join(X, Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, Y)
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 36: join(X, meet(complement(X), Y)) = join(X, Y).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, meet(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, meet(Y, complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 35 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(X, Y)
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 37: meet(X, join(complement(X), Y)) = meet(X, Y).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(X), Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(X), complement(complement(Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(complement(Y)), complement(X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 36 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(complement(Y)), meet(complement(complement(complement(Y))), complement(X))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 34 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(complement(Y)), meet(complement(complement(complement(Y))), complement(meet(complement(complement(complement(Y))), X)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 36 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(complement(Y)), complement(meet(complement(complement(complement(Y))), X))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(complement(Y)), complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))), complement(complement(Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))), meet(complement(complement(Y)), one)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 3 (complement_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))), meet(complement(complement(Y)), join(zero, complement(zero)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 15 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))), meet(complement(complement(Y)), complement(zero))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 22 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))), meet(complement(complement(Y)), complement(meet(complement(complement(Y)), meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y)))))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 32 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, complement(meet(X, complement(complement(complement(Y))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, complement(meet(X, complement(Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(meet(X, complement(meet(X, complement(Y)))), join(complement(complement(Y)), meet(X, complement(meet(X, complement(Y))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 32 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(meet(X, complement(meet(X, complement(Y)))), complement(complement(Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, meet(complement(meet(X, complement(Y))), complement(complement(Y))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, meet(complement(complement(Y)), complement(meet(X, complement(Y)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 33 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, complement(complement(Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, Y)
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Lemma 38: meet(X, join(Y, meet(X, Z))) = meet(X, join(Y, Z)).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(Y, meet(X, Z)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, X)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(Y, meet(Z, complement(complement(X)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 37 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(X), join(Y, meet(Z, complement(complement(X))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(X), join(meet(Z, complement(complement(X))), Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(join(complement(X), meet(Z, complement(complement(X)))), Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 35 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(join(complement(X), Z), Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(complement(X), join(Z, Y)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 37 }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(Z, Y))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(X, join(Y, Z))
% 22.90/3.34
% 22.90/3.34 Goal 1 (prove_distributivity): meet(a, join(b, c)) = join(meet(a, b), meet(a, c)).
% 22.90/3.34 Proof:
% 22.90/3.34 meet(a, join(b, c))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(a, join(c, b))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 38 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 25 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b))), meet(c, meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 26 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b))), meet(c, a))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, a), meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 1 (idempotence_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(c, meet(a, b))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), c)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 38 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(a, c))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, meet(a, b))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, meet(join(a, meet(a, b)), join(a, join(a, meet(a, b))))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, meet(join(a, meet(a, b)), join(a, join(meet(a, b), a)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, meet(join(a, meet(a, b)), join(join(a, meet(a, b)), a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, meet(join(a, meet(a, b)), join(a, a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, meet(join(a, a), join(a, meet(a, b)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(a, meet(a, b))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 18 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(a, meet(c, join(a, a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 38 }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, b))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by lemma 25 R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(b, meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(b, meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, b))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(b, meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(b, meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(meet(b, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a)))), a)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(a, meet(b, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a)))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(meet(a, b), join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(a, b)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a))), meet(b, a)))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(b, a), meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(b, a)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(b, a), meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, b)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, b), meet(a, join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, b)))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.34 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, b), meet(a, join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))))))
% 22.90/3.34 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), join(meet(a, b), meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a)))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.35 join(join(meet(a, b), meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a)), meet(c, join(a, a)))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(a, b), join(meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a), meet(c, join(a, a))))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(a, b), join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a)))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 8 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 22.90/3.35 join(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), meet(join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a))), a))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 7 (absorption2) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(a, b), meet(c, join(a, a)))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(c, join(a, a)), meet(a, b))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 1 (idempotence_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(c, a), meet(a, b))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(a, b), meet(c, a))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(b, a), meet(c, a))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(b, a), meet(a, c))
% 22.90/3.35 = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 22.90/3.35 join(meet(a, b), meet(a, c))
% 22.90/3.35 % SZS output end Proof
% 22.90/3.35
% 22.90/3.35 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------