↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LAT242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:44:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 66.74s 8.95s
% Output   : Proof 66.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 14:05:54 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 66.74/8.95  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 66.74/8.95  
% 66.74/8.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 66.74/8.95  
% 66.74/9.00  % SZS output start Proof
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet): meet(X, Y) = meet(Y, X).
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 2 (complement_meet): meet(X, complement(X)) = zero.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 3 (prove_distributivity_hypothesis): meet(b, a) = a.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 4 (idempotence_of_join): join(X, X) = X.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join): join(X, Y) = join(Y, X).
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 6 (complement_join): join(X, complement(X)) = one.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 8 (absorption1): meet(X, join(X, Y)) = X.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 9 (associativity_of_meet): meet(meet(X, Y), Z) = meet(X, meet(Y, Z)).
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 10 (absorption2): join(X, meet(X, Y)) = X.
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 11 (associativity_of_join): join(join(X, Y), Z) = join(X, join(Y, Z)).
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 12 (equation_H55): join(X, meet(Y, join(X, Z))) = join(X, meet(Y, join(Z, meet(X, join(Z, Y))))).
% 66.74/9.00  Axiom 13 (meet_join_complement): ifeq(join(X, Y), one, ifeq(meet(X, Y), zero, complement(X), Y), Y) = Y.
% 66.74/9.00  
% 66.74/9.00  Lemma 14: join(X, zero) = X.
% 66.74/9.00  Proof:
% 66.74/9.00    join(X, zero)
% 66.74/9.00  = { by axiom 2 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.00    join(X, meet(X, complement(X)))
% 66.74/9.00  = { by axiom 10 (absorption2) }
% 66.74/9.00    X
% 66.74/9.00  
% 66.74/9.00  Lemma 15: join(zero, X) = X.
% 66.74/9.00  Proof:
% 66.74/9.00    join(zero, X)
% 66.74/9.00  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.00    join(X, zero)
% 66.74/9.00  = { by lemma 14 }
% 66.74/9.00    X
% 66.74/9.00  
% 66.74/9.00  Lemma 16: meet(X, zero) = zero.
% 66.74/9.00  Proof:
% 66.74/9.00    meet(X, zero)
% 66.74/9.00  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.00    meet(zero, X)
% 66.74/9.00  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 66.74/9.00    meet(zero, join(zero, X))
% 66.74/9.00  = { by axiom 8 (absorption1) }
% 66.74/9.00    zero
% 66.74/9.01  
% 66.74/9.01  Lemma 17: meet(X, join(Y, X)) = X.
% 66.74/9.01  Proof:
% 66.74/9.01    meet(X, join(Y, X))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    meet(X, join(X, Y))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 8 (absorption1) }
% 66.74/9.01    X
% 66.74/9.01  
% 66.74/9.01  Lemma 18: join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))) = complement(a).
% 66.74/9.01  Proof:
% 66.74/9.01    join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 13 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(complement(b), a)))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 12 (equation_H55) }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(complement(join(complement(b), a)), join(complement(b), a)))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) }
% 66.74/9.01    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(complement(b), a), complement(join(complement(b), a))))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.01  = { by axiom 2 (complement_meet) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, join(complement(b), zero)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by lemma 14 }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(join(complement(b), a)), meet(a, complement(b)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(meet(a, complement(b)), complement(join(complement(b), a)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(meet(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 9 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), join(meet(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a)), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 10 (absorption2) R->L }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a)), join(join(complement(b), meet(complement(b), a)), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 11 (associativity_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a)), join(complement(b), join(meet(complement(b), a), complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a)), join(complement(b), join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by lemma 17 }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(complement(join(a, complement(b))), meet(complement(b), a))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 5 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(complement(b), a), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.02    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.02  = { by axiom 3 (prove_distributivity_hypothesis) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(meet(b, a), complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 9 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(b, meet(a, complement(b))), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(b, meet(complement(b), a)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 9 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(meet(b, complement(b)), a), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 2 (complement_meet) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(zero, a), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(meet(a, zero), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by lemma 16 }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, join(zero, complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by lemma 15 }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, complement(join(a, complement(b)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 8 (absorption1) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(meet(a, join(a, complement(b))), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 9 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, meet(join(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 2 (complement_meet) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(meet(a, zero), zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by lemma 16 }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 11 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(join(join(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 6 (complement_join) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(one, one, ifeq(zero, zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 66.74/9.03    ifeq(zero, zero, complement(a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 66.74/9.03    complement(a)
% 66.74/9.03  
% 66.74/9.03  Goal 1 (prove_distributivity): join(complement(b), complement(a)) = complement(a).
% 66.74/9.03  Proof:
% 66.74/9.03    join(complement(b), complement(a))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    join(complement(b), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 11 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 66.74/9.03    join(join(complement(b), complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by axiom 4 (idempotence_of_join) }
% 66.74/9.03    join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 66.74/9.03  = { by lemma 18 }
% 66.74/9.03    complement(a)
% 66.74/9.03  % SZS output end Proof
% 66.74/9.03  
% 66.74/9.03  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------