↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LAT259-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:37:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.62s 3.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   6 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0,axiom,
    ( X4 = X3
    | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    v_a != v_b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( X4 = X3
    | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    v_a != v_b,
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LAT259-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:56:41 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 4.62/3.50  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 4.62/3.50  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 4.62/3.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.62/3.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.72/3.51  % Total time : 2.539s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------