%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT259-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 8 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
| X4 = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
v_a != v_b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
| X4 = X3 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
v_a != v_b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
| X4 = X3 ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v_a != v_b,
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LAT259-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:23:30 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % new_bool_1 with pid 408875 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/5.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.64 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.64 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % SubtermCWHack with pid 408878 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.64 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.64 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/5.64
% 0.16/5.64 % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.64 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.64 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.64 % Parsed axioms : 2750
% 0.16/5.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2308
% 0.16/5.64 % Initial clauses : 442
% 0.16/5.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 442
% 0.16/5.64 % Processed clauses : 2838
% 0.16/5.64 % ...of these trivial : 46
% 0.16/5.64 % ...subsumed : 1954
% 0.16/5.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 838
% 0.16/5.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 190
% 0.16/5.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Backward-subsumed : 37
% 0.16/5.64 % Backward-rewritten : 18
% 0.16/5.64 % Generated clauses : 10801
% 0.16/5.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7581
% 0.16/5.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.16/5.64 % Paramodulations : 10583
% 0.16/5.64 % Factorizations : 8
% 0.16/5.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Equation resolutions : 210
% 0.16/5.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Total rewrite steps : 6141
% 0.16/5.64 % ...of those cached : 5591
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 783
% 0.16/5.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 146
% 0.16/5.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.16/5.64 % Negative unit clauses : 128
% 0.16/5.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 503
% 0.16/5.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4949
% 0.16/5.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 18016
% 0.16/5.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 55
% 0.16/5.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70986
% 0.16/5.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25822
% 0.16/5.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 569
% 0.16/5.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11186
% 0.16/5.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 380
% 0.16/5.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 20
% 0.16/5.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 171817
% 0.16/5.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7304
% 0.16/5.64
% 0.16/5.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.64 % User time : 0.126 s
% 0.16/5.64 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/5.64 % Total time : 0.137 s
% 0.16/5.64 % Maximum resident set size: 6172 pages
% 0.16/5.64
% 0.16/5.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.64 % User time : 0.180 s
% 0.16/5.64 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.16/5.64 % Total time : 0.195 s
% 0.16/5.64 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 0.16/5.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------