↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LAT259-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:49:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 10.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  23   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(VAR_0,VAR_1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),VAR_1)
      | ~ c_in(VAR_0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(VAR_1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(A,B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),B)
    | ~ c_in(A,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1]) ).

fof(cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( VAR_3 = VAR_2
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(VAR_3,VAR_2,VAR_1,VAR_1),VAR_0,tc_prod(VAR_1,VAR_1))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_1,VAR_1),VAR_0,tc_prod(VAR_1,VAR_1))
      | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( D = C
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(D,C,B,B),A,tc_prod(B,B))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(C,D,B,B),A,tc_prod(B,B))
    | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0]) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( D = C
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(D,C,B,B),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(A,B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(B,B))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(C,D,B,B),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(A,B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(B,B))
    | ~ c_in(A,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

fof(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

fof(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_2,axiom,
    v_a != v_b,
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    v_a != v_b,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    v_b != v_a,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_1,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(B,A,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(A,B,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(B,A,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(A,B,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(B,A,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(A,B,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( v_b = v_a
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    v_b = v_a,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT259-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/10.56  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.56  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:24:06 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.56  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/10.56  % Process 3364648 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.10/10.56  % Fri Sep 25 20:24:06 2026
% 0.10/10.56  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/10.56  
% 0.10/10.56  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/10.57  
% 0.10/10.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.10/10.57  
% 0.10/10.57  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.10/10.57  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.10/10.57  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.10/10.57  % Maximum clause weight is 35.000.
% 0.10/10.57  % Given clauses 7.
% 0.10/10.57  
% 0.10/10.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------