%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT262-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LAT262-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.44 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:23:49 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % new_bool_3 with pid 1131868 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1131871 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 2748
% 0.24/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2684
% 0.24/0.58 % Initial clauses : 64
% 0.24/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.24/0.58 % Processed clauses : 44
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/0.58 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 43
% 0.24/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.24/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.24/0.58 % Generated clauses : 71
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.24/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Paramodulations : 71
% 0.24/0.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 58
% 0.24/0.58 % ...of those cached : 31
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.24/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.24/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
% 0.24/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 70
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.24/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.24/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.24/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 25
% 0.24/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.24/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 24702
% 0.24/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7946
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.58 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 6172 pages
% 0.24/0.58
% 0.24/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58 % User time : 0.054 s
% 0.24/0.58 % System time : 0.020 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Total time : 0.074 s
% 0.24/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 0.24/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------