↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LAT262-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:44:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT262-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.39  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 14:11:11 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.50  Axiom 1 (cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0): c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X, Y), Y, tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X, Y, tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.19/0.50  Axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_0): c_lessequals(v_S, c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), tc_set(t_a)) = true.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_1): c_lessequals(v_S, c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), tc_set(t_a)) = true.
% 0.19/0.50  Proof:
% 0.19/0.50    c_lessequals(v_S, c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), tc_set(t_a))
% 0.19/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) }
% 0.19/0.50    c_lessequals(v_S, c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), tc_set(t_a))
% 0.19/0.50  = { by axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_0) }
% 0.19/0.50    true
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------