%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : LAT264-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:05:39 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.39s % Output : Proof 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LAT264-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 14:37:53 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 0.13/0.39 % SZS output start Proof % 0.13/0.39 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ==> \bottom % 0.13/0.39 c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 This holds because % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 E: % 0.13/0.39 c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) = true__ % 0.13/0.39 f1(c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit))) = true__ % 0.13/0.39 f1(true__) = false__ % 0.13/0.39 G: % 0.13/0.39 true__ = false__ % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 This holds because % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) -> true__ % 0.13/0.39 f1(c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl, t_a), c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit))) -> true__ % 0.13/0.39 f1(true__) -> false__ % 0.13/0.39 false__ -> true__ % 0.13/0.39 with the LPO induced by % 0.13/0.39 tc_Product__Type_Ounit > tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type > c_Tarski_OPartialOrder > t_a > v_cl > c_Tarski_Odual > c_in > f1 > false__ > true__ % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 % SZS output end Proof % 0.13/0.39 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------