↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT265-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.08s 2.87s
% Output   : Refutation 4.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  28   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Tarski_Odual_decl,type,
    c_Tarski_Odual: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_cl_decl,type,
    v_cl: $i ).

thf(t_a_decl,type,
    t_a: $i ).

thf(c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice_decl,type,
    c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice: $i ).

thf(tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type_decl,type,
    tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(tc_Product__Type_Ounit_decl,type,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit: $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( tc_Product__Type_Ounit @ ( t_a @ tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type ) @ ( c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice @ ( t_a @ ( v_cl @ c_Tarski_Odual ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( tc_Product__Type_Ounit @ ( t_a @ tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type ) @ ( c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice @ ( t_a @ ( v_cl @ c_Tarski_Odual ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit @ ( t_a @ tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type ) @ ( c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice @ ( t_a @ ( v_cl @ c_Tarski_Odual ) @ c_in ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0) ).

thf(5,plain,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit @ ( t_a @ tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type ) @ ( c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice @ ( t_a @ ( v_cl @ c_Tarski_Odual ) @ c_in ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3,5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LAT265-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:21:47 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.26/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.68/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (255ms). 
% 1.68/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.69/2.07  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.69/2.08  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.91/2.20  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.91/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.91/2.26  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.91/2.26  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.91/2.27  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.08/2.86  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.08/2.86  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.08/2.86  % Time passed: 2255ms (effective reasoning time: 1415ms)
% 4.08/2.86  % Axioms used in derivation (1): cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0
% 4.08/2.86  % No. of inferences in proof: 5
% 4.08/2.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2255 ms resp. 1415 ms w/o parsing
% 4.34/2.91  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.34/2.91  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------