%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT266-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT266-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:22:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % new_bool_3 with pid 3804139 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.26/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.60 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.60 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3804142 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.60 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.60 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.26/0.60
% 0.26/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 2752
% 0.26/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2570
% 0.26/0.60 % Initial clauses : 182
% 0.26/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 182
% 0.26/0.60 % Processed clauses : 87
% 0.26/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.26/0.60 % ...subsumed : 11
% 0.26/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.26/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.26/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.26/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.26/0.60 % Generated clauses : 56
% 0.26/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
% 0.26/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Paramodulations : 55
% 0.26/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.26/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 26
% 0.26/0.60 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.26/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.26/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.26/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.26/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 126
% 0.26/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 424
% 0.26/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.26/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75
% 0.26/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.26/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.26/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.26/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 25
% 0.26/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.26/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 28546
% 0.26/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7742
% 0.26/0.60
% 0.26/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.60 % User time : 0.022 s
% 0.26/0.60 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.60 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.26/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 6180 pages
% 0.26/0.60
% 0.26/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.60 % User time : 0.116 s
% 0.26/0.60 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.26/0.60 % Total time : 0.135 s
% 0.26/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.26/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------