%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT269-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 3 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 9 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_Ox1_A_58_AA_A_61_61_62_Ainterval_Ar_Ax1_A_ITop_Acl_J_A_61_A_123_125_A_61_61_AFalse_0,axiom,
( c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X1,c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),t_a) != c_emptyset
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ox1_A_58_AA_A_61_61_62_Ainterval_Ar_Ax1_A_ITop_Acl_J_A_61_A_123_125_A_61_61_AFalse_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_O_91_124_Aa2_A_58_AA_59_Ab2_A_58_AA_59_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_A_126_61_A_123_125_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_I_124_Apset_A_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_M_Aorder_A_61_Ainduced_A_Iinterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_J_Ar_A_124_J_A_58_ACompleteLattice_A_61_61_ATrue_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a)
| c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a) = c_emptyset
| c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),c_Tarski_Oinduced(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_Aa2_A_58_AA_59_Ab2_A_58_AA_59_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_A_126_61_A_123_125_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_I_124_Apset_A_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_M_Aorder_A_61_Ainduced_A_Iinterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_J_Ar_A_124_J_A_58_ACompleteLattice_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OintY1_A_61_61_Ainterval_Ar_A_Ilub_AY_Acl_J_A_ITop_Acl_J_0,axiom,
v_intY1 = c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,c_Tarski_Olub(v_Y,v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OintY1_A_61_61_Ainterval_Ar_A_Ilub_AY_Acl_J_A_ITop_Acl_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Olub_AY_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(v_Y,v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Olub_AY_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(v_intY1,c_Tarski_Oinduced(v_intY1,v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OTop_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OTop_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X1,c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),t_a) != c_emptyset
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_Ox1_A_58_AA_A_61_61_62_Ainterval_Ar_Ax1_A_ITop_Acl_J_A_61_A_123_125_A_61_61_AFalse_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a)
| c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a) = c_emptyset
| c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),c_Tarski_Oinduced(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_O_91_124_Aa2_A_58_AA_59_Ab2_A_58_AA_59_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_A_126_61_A_123_125_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_I_124_Apset_A_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_M_Aorder_A_61_Ainduced_A_Iinterval_Ar_Aa2_Ab2_J_Ar_A_124_J_A_58_ACompleteLattice_A_61_61_ATrue_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X1,c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),t_a) != c_emptyset
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
v_intY1 = c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,c_Tarski_Olub(v_Y,v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),t_a),
cls_Tarski_OintY1_A_61_61_Ainterval_Ar_A_Ilub_AY_Acl_J_A_ITop_Acl_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(v_Y,v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
cls_Tarski_Olub_AY_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(v_intY1,c_Tarski_Oinduced(v_intY1,v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a)
| c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a) = c_emptyset
| c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),c_Tarski_Oinduced(c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X2,X1,t_a),v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_OTop(v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
cls_Tarski_OTop_Acl_A_58_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_emptyset != v_intY1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext(v_intY1,c_Tarski_Oinduced(v_intY1,v_r,t_a),c_Product__Type_OUnity,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT269-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:25:17 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 1443676 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % partial match(2): FGHSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1443682 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % partial match(2): FGHSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 338
% 0.11/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------