↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LAT271-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.50s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  11 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(X4,X0,X2,X2),X3,tc_prod(X2,X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X3,X4,X5,X2),tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(X2,X5,X4,X4),X1,tc_prod(X4,X4))
      | ~ c_in(X5,X0,X4)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X1,X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(v_a,X0,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_S,t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_88,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = tc_prod(t_a,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_89,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(v_a,X0,t_a,t_a),v_r,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_S,t_a) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_88]) ).

tcf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(iPr_def_11,v_r,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_89]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_200,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_11,v_r,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_91,c_92]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT271-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:48:23 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.50/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.50/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % 
% 1.50/1.27  % clauses                               5
% 1.50/1.27  % conjectures                           2
% 1.50/1.27  % EPR                                   2
% 1.50/1.27  % Horn                                  5
% 1.50/1.27  % unary                                 4
% 1.50/1.27  % binary                                1
% 1.50/1.27  % lits                                  6
% 1.50/1.27  % lits eq                               2
% 1.50/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.50/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.50/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.50/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.50/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.50/1.27  % Current options:
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.50/1.27  % 
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------