↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : LAT277-2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 07:11:38 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.73s 1.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  11   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (  13   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Relation_Orefl > c_Pair > c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset > c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder > tc_prod > tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type > #nlpp > v_x > v_r > v_cl > v_A > tc_Product__Type_Ounit > t_a > c_Tarski_OPartialOrder

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(v_x,type,
    v_x: $i ).

tff(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset,type,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(t_a,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(v_cl,type,
    v_cl: $i ).

tff(tc_prod,type,
    tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(tc_Product__Type_Ounit,type,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit: $i ).

tff(c_Relation_Orefl,type,
    c_Relation_Orefl: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_in,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder,type,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_r,type,
    v_r: $i ).

tff(c_Pair,type,
    c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,type,
    c_Tarski_OPartialOrder: $i ).

tff(v_A,type,
    v_A: $i ).

tff(tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type,type,
    tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_42,axiom,
    ! [V_P,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_P,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
      | c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(V_P,T_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P,T_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),T_a) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [V_A,V_r,T_a,V_a] :
      ( ~ c_Relation_Orefl(V_A,V_r,T_a)
      | ~ c_in(V_a,V_A,T_a)
      | c_in(c_Pair(V_a,V_a,T_a,T_a),V_r,tc_prod(T_a,T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_A,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_23,plain,
    ! [V_P_7,T_a_8] :
      ( c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(V_P_7,T_a_8,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P_7,T_a_8,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),T_a_8)
      | ~ c_in(V_P_7,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a_8,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ( c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),v_r,t_a)
    | ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14,c_23]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_8,c_26]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [V_a_9,T_a_10,V_r_11,V_A_12] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(V_a_9,V_a_9,T_a_10,T_a_10),V_r_11,tc_prod(T_a_10,T_a_10))
      | ~ c_in(V_a_9,V_A_12,T_a_10)
      | ~ c_Relation_Orefl(V_A_12,V_r_11,T_a_10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [V_r_13] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),V_r_13,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
      | ~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,V_r_13,t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_35]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_4]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_31,c_47]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : LAT277-2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 03:59:19 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.73/1.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/1.71  
% 2.73/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------