%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : LAT277-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:29:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.68s 5.89s
% Output : Refutation 5.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 16 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Relation_OreflD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Relation_Orefl(X14,X13,X12)
| ~ c_in(X15,X14,X12)
| c_in(c_Pair(X15,X15,X12,X12),X13,tc_prod(X12,X12)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_OreflD_0) ).
cnf(c15,plain,
( ~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,X93,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),X93,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Relation_OreflD_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
X2 = X2,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(symmetry,axiom,
( X4 != X3
| X3 = X4 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
cnf(c8,plain,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_A,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,symmetry]) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
cnf(c9,plain,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,symmetry]) ).
cnf(c6,axiom,
( X76 != X78
| X80 != X81
| X77 != X79
| ~ c_Relation_Orefl(X76,X80,X77)
| c_Relation_Orefl(X78,X81,X79) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X18,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X17,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X18,X17,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X18,X17,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0) ).
cnf(c22,plain,
c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0,cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0]) ).
cnf(c173,plain,
( c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != X1262
| c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != X1263
| t_a != X1261
| c_Relation_Orefl(X1262,X1263,X1261) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22,c6]) ).
cnf(c19400,plain,
( c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != X1265
| t_a != X1266
| c_Relation_Orefl(X1265,v_r,X1266) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c173,c9]) ).
cnf(c19402,plain,
( t_a != X1267
| c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,X1267) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19400,c8]) ).
cnf(c19403,plain,
c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19402,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c19404,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19403,c15]) ).
cnf(c19519,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19404,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LAT277-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 13:00:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 5.68/5.89 % Version: 1.5
% 5.68/5.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.68/5.89 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.68/5.89
% 5.68/5.89 % Initial clauses : 17
% 5.68/5.89 % Processed clauses : 373
% 5.68/5.89 % Factors computed : 82
% 5.68/5.89 % Resolvents computed: 19433
% 5.68/5.89 % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 5.68/5.89 % Forward subsumed : 233
% 5.68/5.89 % Backward subsumed : 62
% 5.68/5.89 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 5.68/5.89 % User time : 5.461 s
% 5.68/5.89 % System time : 0.073 s
% 5.68/5.89 % Total time : 5.534 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------