%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LAT278-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:39 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LAT278-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:28:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % new_bool_3 with pid 4170959 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.49 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4170963 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.49 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.49
% 0.13/0.49 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 2744
% 0.13/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2706
% 0.13/0.49 % Initial clauses : 38
% 0.13/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.13/0.49 % Processed clauses : 42
% 0.13/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.13/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.13/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.13/0.49 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.13/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.13/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.49 % Paramodulations : 15
% 0.13/0.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.31/0.49 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 0.31/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.31/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.31/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.31/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.31/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 10
% 0.31/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.31/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16
% 0.31/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.31/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.31/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.31/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.31/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.31/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 24014
% 0.31/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8008
% 0.31/0.49
% 0.31/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.49 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.31/0.49 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.31/0.49 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.31/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 6168 pages
% 0.31/0.49
% 0.31/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.49 % User time : 0.068 s
% 0.31/0.49 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.31/0.49 % Total time : 0.081 s
% 0.31/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 0.31/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------