%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : LAT279-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:58:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.11s 1.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 14 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X1)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X1)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_77,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| ( X1 != t_a )
| ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != v_r ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_78,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != v_r ) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).
tcf(c_88,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( c_Tarski_OPartialOrder != c_Tarski_OPartialOrder )
| ( X0 != v_cl )
| ( tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) )
| ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != v_r ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_78]) ).
tcf(c_89,plain,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != v_r,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).
tcf(c_90,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_56]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT279-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 20:52:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.62
% 0.11/0.62 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.62
% 0.11/0.62 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.63 % Proving...
% 1.11/1.48 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.11/1.48 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.11/1.48 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s%
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.11/1.48
% 1.11/1.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------