%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem : LAT280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:48:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 12 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a),
file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2,axiom,
( c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P,T_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),T_a)
| ~ c_in(V_P,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
cnf(equality_1,axiom,
Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).
cnf(equality_2,axiom,
( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).
cnf(equality_6,axiom,
( c_Relation_Otrans(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1)
| Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).
cnf(t1,plain,
~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a),
inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(t2,plain,
( t_a != t_a
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a)
| c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) != v_r
| c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_6]) ).
cnf(t3,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).
cnf(t4,plain,
( v_r != c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)
| c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_2]) ).
cnf(t5,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).
cnf(t6,plain,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0]) ).
cnf(t7,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).
cnf(t8,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2]) ).
cnf(t9,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t2:3]) ).
cnf(t10,plain,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0]) ).
cnf(t11,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).
cnf(t12,plain,
t_a = t_a,
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:4)],[equality_1]) ).
cnf(t13,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t2:4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 13:00:33 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------