%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : LAT280-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:05:51 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s % Output : Proof 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LAT280-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 04:12:02 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 0.13/0.38 % SZS output start Proof % 0.13/0.38 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 c_Relation_Otrans(v_r, t_a) ==> \bottom % 0.13/0.38 c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ==> c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a) % 0.13/0.38 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) % 0.13/0.38 v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit) % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 This holds because % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 E: % 0.13/0.38 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) = true__ % 0.13/0.38 f1(c_Relation_Otrans(v_r, t_a)) = true__ % 0.13/0.38 f1(true__) = false__ % 0.13/0.38 f2(c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)), V_P, T_a) = true__ % 0.13/0.38 f2(true__, V_P, T_a) = c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a) % 0.13/0.38 v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit) % 0.13/0.38 G: % 0.13/0.38 true__ = false__ % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 This holds because % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a) -> f2(true__, V_P, T_a) % 0.13/0.38 c_Relation_Otrans(v_r, t_a) -> f2(true__, v_cl, t_a) % 0.13/0.38 c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit) -> v_r % 0.13/0.38 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) -> true__ % 0.13/0.38 f1(c_Relation_Otrans(v_r, t_a)) -> true__ % 0.13/0.38 f1(true__) -> false__ % 0.13/0.38 f2(c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)), V_P, T_a) -> true__ % 0.13/0.38 f2(true__, v_cl, t_a) -> true__ % 0.13/0.38 false__ -> true__ % 0.13/0.38 with the LPO induced by % 0.13/0.38 c_Relation_Otrans > f2 > c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder > v_r > v_cl > tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type > c_Tarski_OPartialOrder > c_in > t_a > tc_Product__Type_Ounit > f1 > false__ > true__ % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 % SZS output end Proof % 0.13/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------