↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LAT287+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:04:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 50.86s 18.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 50.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  117 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  135 (  53   ~;  39   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   1 sgn  27   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t16_lopclset,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_lopclset) ).

fof(redefinition_m2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( m2_subset_1(X3,X1,X2)
        <=> m1_subset_1(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',redefinition_m2_subset_1) ).

fof(t7_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_lopclset) ).

fof(fc1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',fc1_subset_1) ).

fof(t13_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_lopclset) ).

fof(dt_k1_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_lopclset) ).

fof(fc1_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_lopclset) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
       => m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t16_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( m2_subset_1(X3,X1,X2)
        <=> m1_subset_1(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[redefinition_m2_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t7_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
       => m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t13_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1398,X1399,X1400] :
      ( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1399,k1_zfmisc_1(X1398))
        | v1_xboole_0(X1399)
        | v1_xboole_0(X1398)
        | m2_subset_1(X1400,X1398,X1399)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X1400,X1399) )
      & ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1399,k1_zfmisc_1(X1398))
        | v1_xboole_0(X1399)
        | v1_xboole_0(X1398)
        | m1_subset_1(X1400,X1399)
        | ~ m2_subset_1(X1400,X1398,X1399) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X50] :
      ( m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X50),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X50)),k1_lopclset(X50))
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X50)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X50)
      | v3_struct_0(X50) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X788] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X788)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
     => ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk1_0)))
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X26] :
      ( u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X26)) = k1_lopclset(X26)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X26)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X26)
      | v3_struct_0(X26) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ m2_subset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | v1_xboole_0(X3)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X91] :
      ( m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X91),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X91))))
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X91)
      | v3_struct_0(X91) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X92] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X92))
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X92)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X92)
      | v3_struct_0(X92) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1))
    | m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
    | v3_struct_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk1_0),k1_lopclset(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31,c_0_32,c_0_33,c_0_29,c_0_27,c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LAT287+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/10.45  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/10.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/10.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/10.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/10.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/10.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/10.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/10.45  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 23:27:20 UTC 2026
% 0.16/10.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/10.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/10.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/10.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 50.86/18.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 50.86/18.45  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 50.86/18.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % new_bool_3 with pid 1140947 completed with status 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 50.86/18.45  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 50.86/18.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 50.86/18.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 50.86/18.45  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 50.86/18.45  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 91s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 68s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % new_bool_3 with pid 1140955 completed with status 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 50.86/18.45  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 50.86/18.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 50.86/18.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 50.86/18.45  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 50.86/18.45  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 91s (1) cores
% 50.86/18.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.071 s
% 50.86/18.45  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 50.86/18.45  % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 50.86/18.45  
% 50.86/18.45  % Proof found!
% 50.86/18.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 50.86/18.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 50.86/18.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 12372
% 50.86/18.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10923
% 50.86/18.45  % Initial clauses                      : 2995
% 50.86/18.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 42
% 50.86/18.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2953
% 50.86/18.45  % Processed clauses                    : 25246
% 50.86/18.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 979
% 50.86/18.45  % ...subsumed                          : 14267
% 50.86/18.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 10000
% 50.86/18.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 977
% 50.86/18.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 229
% 50.86/18.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 152
% 50.86/18.45  % Generated clauses                    : 144552
% 50.86/18.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 124704
% 50.86/18.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 168
% 50.86/18.45  % Paramodulations                      : 143446
% 50.86/18.45  % Factorizations                       : 36
% 50.86/18.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 1014
% 50.86/18.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 41547
% 50.86/18.45  % ...of those cached                   : 36634
% 50.86/18.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 2
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional check models        : 1
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 111551
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 10260
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 7
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.273
% 50.86/18.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.060
% 50.86/18.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 50.86/18.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.245
% 50.86/18.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.034
% 50.86/18.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6631
% 50.86/18.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1675
% 50.86/18.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 50.86/18.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1595
% 50.86/18.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3353
% 50.86/18.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 104920
% 50.86/18.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 352312
% 50.86/18.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3184
% 50.86/18.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7886421
% 50.86/18.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1395566
% 50.86/18.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1864
% 50.86/18.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 988260
% 50.86/18.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 638
% 50.86/18.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 415
% 50.86/18.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 50.86/18.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3036342
% 50.86/18.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 146621
% 50.86/18.45  
% 50.86/18.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 50.86/18.45  % User time                : 7.055 s
% 50.86/18.45  % System time              : 0.240 s
% 50.86/18.45  % Total time               : 7.295 s
% 50.86/18.45  % Maximum resident set size: 28948 pages
% 50.86/18.45  
% 50.86/18.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 50.86/18.45  % User time                : 21.257 s
% 50.86/18.45  % System time              : 0.570 s
% 50.86/18.45  % Total time               : 21.828 s
% 50.86/18.45  % Maximum resident set size: 21248 pages
% 50.86/18.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------