↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.CAX-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT298+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 159.96s 40.45s
% Output   : Refutation 159.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  65 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  168 (  24   ~;  22   |;  11   &;  99   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0   ^;  55   !;   3   ?;  60   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v1_relat_1_decl,type,
    v1_relat_1: $i > $o ).

thf(v1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).

thf(k2_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(sk43_decl,type,
    sk43: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk78_decl,type,
    sk78: $i ).

thf(sk43_def,definition,
    ( sk43
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(sk78_def,definition,
    ( sk78
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ v1_relat_1 )
          & ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(61,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_xboole_0) ).

thf(961,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(962,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[961]) ).

thf(963,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
        | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[962]) ).

thf(965,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[963]) ).

thf(967,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[965]) ).

thf(968,plain,
    k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[967]) ).

thf(190,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_relat_1 )
      & ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_relat_1) ).

thf(1571,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_relat_1 )
      & ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[190]) ).

thf(1572,plain,
    ( ( sk78 @ v1_relat_1 )
    & ~ ( sk78 @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1571]) ).

thf(1573,plain,
    ~ ( sk78 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1572]) ).

thf(4018,plain,
    ( ( ( sk78 @ v1_xboole_0 )
     != ( k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[968,1573]) ).

thf(4019,plain,
    ( ( sk78 @ v1_xboole_0 )
   != ( k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4018]) ).

thf(4020,plain,
    sk78 != k1_xboole_0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4019]) ).

thf(73,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(1024,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

thf(1025,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[1024]) ).

thf(1026,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( D != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( C != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
         != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1025]) ).

thf(1029,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1026]) ).

thf(1033,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1029]) ).

thf(1034,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1033]) ).

thf(105,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(1183,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[105]) ).

thf(1184,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1183]) ).

thf(1185,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1184]) ).

thf(1186,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[1185]) ).

thf(1187,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk43 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1186]) ).

thf(40939,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk43 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1187]) ).

thf(40982,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk43 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1034,40939]) ).

thf(40983,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk43 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[40982:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(1028,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1026]) ).

thf(1031,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1028]) ).

thf(1032,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1031]) ).

thf(40952,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk43 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1032,40939]) ).

thf(40953,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ sk43 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[40952:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( k1_xboole_0 )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(41507,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( k1_xboole_0 = A ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[40983,40953]) ).

thf(41527,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[4020,41507]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LAT298+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.50  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.50  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.50  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.50  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.50  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:37:52 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.50  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.43/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 5.77/2.52  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (1148ms). 
% 5.77/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 7.33/3.15  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 7.52/3.16  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 9.12/3.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2933 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 12.52/4.68  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 666 axioms (removed 2267 axioms). 
% 15.36/5.72  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 15.79/5.80  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 15.79/5.81  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 159.96/40.44  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 159.96/40.44  % Time passed: 39727ms (effective reasoning time: 37884ms)
% 159.96/40.45  % Axioms used in derivation (4): d5_xboole_0, rc2_relat_1, t113_zfmisc_1, t115_zfmisc_1
% 159.96/40.45  % No. of inferences in proof: 37
% 159.96/40.45  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 39727 ms resp. 37884 ms w/o parsing
% 159.96/40.49  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 159.96/40.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------