↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT299+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 259.00s 79.60s
% Output   : Refutation 259.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   94 (  52 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  225 ( 117 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  685 (  69   ~;  40   |;  46   &; 501   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  28  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   29 (  26 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  165 (   0   ^; 159   !;   2   ?; 165   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   4  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v3_struct_0_decl,type,
    v3_struct_0: $i > $o ).

thf(v10_lattices_decl,type,
    v10_lattices: $i > $o ).

thf(l3_lattices_decl,type,
    l3_lattices: $i > $o ).

thf(g3_lattices_decl,type,
    g3_lattices: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(u1_struct_0_decl,type,
    u1_struct_0: $i > $i ).

thf(u2_lattices_decl,type,
    u2_lattices: $i > $i ).

thf(u1_lattices_decl,type,
    u1_lattices: $i > $i ).

thf(m2_filter_2_decl,type,
    m2_filter_2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v1_funct_1_decl,type,
    v1_funct_1: $i > $o ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(k2_funcop_1_decl,type,
    k2_funcop_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v1_relat_1_decl,type,
    v1_relat_1: $i > $o ).

thf(k2_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k1_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).

thf(v1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).

thf(v2_funct_1_decl,type,
    v2_funct_1: $i > $o ).

thf(k1_tarski_decl,type,
    k1_tarski: $i > $i ).

thf(r1_tarski_decl,type,
    r1_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v1_finset_1_decl,type,
    v1_finset_1: $i > $o ).

thf(k4_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k4_xboole_0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k3_tarski_decl,type,
    k3_tarski: $i > $i ).

thf(k3_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k3_xboole_0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk25_decl,type,
    sk25: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( ( A @ l3_lattices )
              & ( A @ v10_lattices )
              & ~ ( A @ v3_struct_0 ) )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( ( B @ l3_lattices )
                  & ( B @ v10_lattices )
                  & ~ ( B @ v3_struct_0 ) )
               => ( ( ( A @ u1_lattices @ ( A @ u2_lattices @ ( A @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
                    = ( B @ u1_lattices @ ( B @ u2_lattices @ ( B @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
                 => ! [C: $i] :
                      ( ( A @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) )
                     => ( B @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( ( A @ l3_lattices )
              & ( A @ v10_lattices )
              & ~ ( A @ v3_struct_0 ) )
           => ( ( ( sk1 @ u1_lattices @ ( sk1 @ u2_lattices @ ( sk1 @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
                = ( A @ u1_lattices @ ( A @ u2_lattices @ ( A @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( sk1 @ ( B @ m2_filter_2 ) )
                 => ( A @ ( B @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( sk1 @ ( A @ m2_filter_2 ) )
           => ( sk2 @ ( A @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk25_def,definition,
    ( sk25
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(150,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ r1_tarski ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t100_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2026,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ r1_tarski ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[150]) ).

thf(2027,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ r1_tarski ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[2026]) ).

thf(616,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(4510,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[616]) ).

thf(4511,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[4510]) ).

thf(4512,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( D != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( C != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
         != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4511]) ).

thf(4514,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4512]) ).

thf(4517,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4514]) ).

thf(4518,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4517]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
      = ( B @ k1_tarski @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_funcop_1) ).

thf(1377,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
      = ( B @ k1_tarski @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(1378,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
      = ( B @ k1_tarski @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1377]) ).

thf(1379,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ k1_tarski @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1378]) ).

thf(14037,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( C @ k1_tarski @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[4518,1379]) ).

thf(14038,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[14037:[bind(A,$thf( D @ k1_tarski )),bind(B,$thf( k1_xboole_0 )),bind(C,$thf( D ))]]) ).

thf(14058,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[14038]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
     => ( ( B = D )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_funct_4) ).

thf(1390,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
     => ( ( B = D )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(1391,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B = D )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1390]) ).

thf(1392,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( D @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( B = D )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1391]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ l3_lattices )
        & ( A @ v10_lattices )
        & ~ ( A @ v3_struct_0 ) )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ l3_lattices )
            & ( B @ v10_lattices )
            & ~ ( B @ v3_struct_0 ) )
         => ( ( ( A @ u1_lattices @ ( A @ u2_lattices @ ( A @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
              = ( B @ u1_lattices @ ( B @ u2_lattices @ ( B @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( A @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) )
               => ( B @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_filter_2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ l3_lattices )
          & ( A @ v10_lattices )
          & ~ ( A @ v3_struct_0 ) )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ l3_lattices )
              & ( B @ v10_lattices )
              & ~ ( B @ v3_struct_0 ) )
           => ( ( ( A @ u1_lattices @ ( A @ u2_lattices @ ( A @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
                = ( B @ u1_lattices @ ( B @ u2_lattices @ ( B @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) )
                 => ( B @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(1312,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ l3_lattices )
          & ( A @ v10_lattices )
          & ~ ( A @ v3_struct_0 ) )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ l3_lattices )
              & ( B @ v10_lattices )
              & ~ ( B @ v3_struct_0 ) )
           => ( ( ( A @ u1_lattices @ ( A @ u2_lattices @ ( A @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
                = ( B @ u1_lattices @ ( B @ u2_lattices @ ( B @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) )
                 => ( B @ ( C @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(1313,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) )
    & ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ u1_lattices @ ( sk1 @ u2_lattices @ ( sk1 @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) )
      = ( sk2 @ u1_lattices @ ( sk2 @ u2_lattices @ ( sk2 @ u1_struct_0 @ g3_lattices ) ) ) )
    & ( sk2 @ l3_lattices )
    & ( sk2 @ v10_lattices )
    & ~ ( sk2 @ v3_struct_0 )
    & ( sk1 @ l3_lattices )
    & ( sk1 @ v10_lattices )
    & ~ ( sk1 @ v3_struct_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1312]) ).

thf(1320,plain,
    sk1 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1313]) ).

thf(1314,plain,
    ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1313]) ).

thf(8015,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) )
     != ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1320,1314]) ).

thf(8016,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) )
   != ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ m2_filter_2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8015]) ).

thf(8017,plain,
    ( ( sk2 != sk1 )
    | ( sk3 != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8016]) ).

thf(8018,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8017]) ).

thf(15876,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B != sk2 )
      | ( D != sk1 )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1392,8018]) ).

thf(15877,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C != sk1 )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[15876:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(20257,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( B @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15877]) ).

thf(21961,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
       != ( sk1 @ ( C @ k2_funcop_1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( B @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14058,20257]) ).

thf(21962,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[21961:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(22551,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) )
      | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[21962]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v2_funct_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_funct_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_relat_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funcop_1) ).

thf(1365,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v2_funct_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_funct_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_relat_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(1366,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v2_funct_1 )
    & ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_funct_1 )
    & ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_relat_1 )
    & ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[1365]) ).

thf(1367,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v2_funct_1 )
      & ( C @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_funct_1 )
      & ( B @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_relat_1 )
      & ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1366]) ).

thf(1368,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1367]) ).

thf(531,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_finset_1 )
      & ~ ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_finset_1) ).

thf(4046,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_finset_1 )
      & ~ ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[531]) ).

thf(4047,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_finset_1 )
    & ~ ? [A: $i] : ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[4046]) ).

thf(4048,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ k1_tarski @ v1_finset_1 )
      & ~ ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4047]) ).

thf(4049,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4048]) ).

thf(12439,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 )
       != ( B @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1368,4049]) ).

thf(12440,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ v1_xboole_0 )
     != ( B @ k1_tarski @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12439]) ).

thf(12460,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k2_funcop_1 ) )
     != ( B @ k1_tarski ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12440]) ).

thf(35535,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ k1_tarski )
     != k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[12460,14058]) ).

thf(69705,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( B @ k1_tarski ) )
      | ( k1_xboole_0 != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[22551,35535]) ).

thf(69706,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( B @ k1_tarski ) )
      | ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[69705]) ).

thf(69707,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[69706:[bind(A,$thf( C @ k1_tarski )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(70680,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[69707]) ).

thf(80348,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ r1_tarski ) )
       != ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( B @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2027,70680]) ).

thf(80349,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ r1_tarski ) )
     != ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( sk2 @ ( B @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ r1_tarski ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80348]) ).

thf(80460,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 )
       != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A
       != ( sk2 @ ( B @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80349]) ).

thf(80497,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( A @ k1_tarski @ k2_funcop_1 ) @ k3_tarski @ k1_zfmisc_1 )
     != k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80460]) ).

thf(411,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_boole) ).

thf(3359,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[411]) ).

thf(3360,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3359]) ).

thf(3361,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3360]) ).

thf(97,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_xboole_1) ).

thf(1758,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

thf(1759,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1758]) ).

thf(1760,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k3_xboole_0 ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1759]) ).

thf(197470,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[3361,1760]) ).

thf(64,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).

thf(1628,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

thf(1629,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1628]) ).

thf(1630,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1629]) ).

thf(211631,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[197470,1630]) ).

thf(103,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t32_xboole_1) ).

thf(1781,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[103]) ).

thf(1782,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1781]) ).

thf(1783,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1782]) ).

thf(1784,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[1783]) ).

thf(1785,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( B @ sk25 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1784]) ).

thf(212612,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) @ ( B @ sk25 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1785]) ).

thf(212649,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk25 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[211631,212612]) ).

thf(212650,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ sk25 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[212649:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(255,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_boole) ).

thf(2534,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[255]) ).

thf(2535,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[2534]) ).

thf(2536,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[2535]) ).

thf(212643,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ k4_xboole_0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k4_xboole_0 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk25 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2536,212612]) ).

thf(212644,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ sk25 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[212643:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( k1_xboole_0 )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(215818,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( k1_xboole_0 = A ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[212650,212644]) ).

thf(215943,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[80497,215818]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LAT299+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.05/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:36:21 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.32  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.39/0.59  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 3.44/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (809ms). 
% 3.44/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.60/1.59  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.79/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 5.42/2.10  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 13593 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 7.91/3.55  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1309 axioms (removed 12284 axioms). 
% 9.49/4.04  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 9.49/4.09  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 9.49/4.09  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 269.19/79.59  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 269.19/79.59  % Time passed: 79203ms (effective reasoning time: 78168ms)
% 269.19/79.59  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 269.19/79.60  % Axioms used in derivation (11): t113_zfmisc_1, t2_boole, d2_funcop_1, t48_xboole_1, fc1_finset_1, t100_zfmisc_1, t7_funct_4, fc2_funcop_1, t3_boole, t4_boole, t32_xboole_1
% 269.19/79.60  % No. of inferences in proof: 90
% 259.00/79.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 79203 ms resp. 78168 ms w/o parsing
% 259.00/79.63  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 259.00/79.63  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------