↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LAT300+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:37:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 23.92s 14.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 24.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  138 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (  63   ~;  46   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   3 sgn  50   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(dt_m2_filter_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
         => ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
            & m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_filter_2) ).

fof(t24_filter_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
         => ? [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
              & r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2) ).

fof(dt_m2_lattice4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
         => m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+375.ax',dt_m2_lattice4) ).

fof(t69_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
     => ~ ( r1_tarski(X2,X1)
          & r1_xboole_0(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t69_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    <=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t3_subset) ).

fof(t4_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
     => m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t4_subset) ).

fof(t34_mcart_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ~ ( X1 != k1_xboole_0
        & ! [X2] :
            ~ ( r2_hidden(X2,X1)
              & ! [X3,X4,X5,X6] :
                  ~ ( ( r2_hidden(X3,X1)
                      | r2_hidden(X4,X1) )
                    & X2 = k4_mcart_1(X3,X4,X5,X6) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+18.ax',t34_mcart_1) ).

fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( r1_xboole_0(X1,X2)
     => r1_xboole_0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t65_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t65_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
         => ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
            & m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_filter_2]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v10_lattices(X1)
          & l3_lattices(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
           => ? [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
                & r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t24_filter_2])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
         => m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_lattice4]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X6701,X6702] :
      ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X6702)
        | ~ m2_filter_2(X6702,X6701)
        | v3_struct_0(X6701)
        | ~ v10_lattices(X6701)
        | ~ l3_lattices(X6701) )
      & ( m2_lattice4(X6702,X6701)
        | ~ m2_filter_2(X6702,X6701)
        | v3_struct_0(X6701)
        | ~ v10_lattices(X6701)
        | ~ l3_lattices(X6701) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6191] :
      ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
      & v10_lattices(esk1_0)
      & l3_lattices(esk1_0)
      & m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      & ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6191,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
        | ~ r2_hidden(X6191,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X8643,X8644] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X8643)
      | ~ v10_lattices(X8643)
      | ~ l3_lattices(X8643)
      | ~ m2_lattice4(X8644,X8643)
      | m1_subset_1(X8644,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X8643))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( m2_lattice4(X1,X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ m2_filter_2(X1,X2)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X2)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    v10_lattices(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    l3_lattices(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
     => ~ ( r1_tarski(X2,X1)
          & r1_xboole_0(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t69_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X6680,X6681] :
      ( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6680,k1_zfmisc_1(X6681))
        | r1_tarski(X6680,X6681) )
      & ( ~ r1_tarski(X6680,X6681)
        | m1_subset_1(X6680,k1_zfmisc_1(X6681)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    m2_lattice4(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X6406,X6407,X6408] :
      ( ~ r2_hidden(X6406,X6407)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X6407,k1_zfmisc_1(X6408))
      | m1_subset_1(X6406,X6408) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X7041,X7042] :
      ( v1_xboole_0(X7042)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X7042,X7041)
      | ~ r1_xboole_0(X7042,X7041) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | ~ m2_filter_2(X1,X2)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X2)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X10633,X10635,X10636,X10637,X10638] :
      ( ( r2_hidden(esk437_1(X10633),X10633)
        | X10633 = k1_xboole_0 )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(X10635,X10633)
        | esk437_1(X10633) != k4_mcart_1(X10635,X10636,X10637,X10638)
        | X10633 = k1_xboole_0 )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(X10636,X10633)
        | esk437_1(X10633) != k4_mcart_1(X10635,X10636,X10637,X10638)
        | X10633 = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t34_mcart_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X9308,X9309] :
      ( ~ r1_xboole_0(X9308,X9309)
      | r1_xboole_0(X9309,X9308) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_r1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X7332] : r1_xboole_0(X7332,k1_xboole_0),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t65_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1_xboole_0(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    r1_tarski(esk2_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk437_1(X1),X1)
    | X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( r1_xboole_0(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1_xboole_0(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    r1_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_xboole_0(esk2_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    r1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : LAT300+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:08:46 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 23.92/14.77  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 23.92/14.77  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 23.92/14.77  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 23.92/14.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 24.02/14.85  % Total time : 11.211s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------