%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : LAT300+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:37:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 44.46s 43.91s
% Output : CNFRefutation 44.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 122 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 139 ( 50 ~; 41 |; 27 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 17 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 1 sgn 31 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(dt_m2_filter_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
& m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_filter_2) ).
fof(t24_filter_2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ? [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
& r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2) ).
fof(dt_m2_lattice4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
=> m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+375.ax',dt_m2_lattice4) ).
fof(d2_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ( m1_subset_1(X2,X1)
<=> r2_hidden(X2,X1) ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ( m1_subset_1(X2,X1)
<=> v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',d2_subset_1) ).
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
=> m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t4_subset) ).
fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
? [X2] : m1_subset_1(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
& m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_filter_2]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ? [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
& r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t24_filter_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
=> m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_lattice4]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X316,X317] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X317)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X317,X316)
| v3_struct_0(X316)
| ~ v10_lattices(X316)
| ~ l3_lattices(X316) )
& ( m2_lattice4(X317,X316)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X317,X316)
| v3_struct_0(X316)
| ~ v10_lattices(X316)
| ~ l3_lattices(X316) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X278] :
( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
& v10_lattices(esk1_0)
& l3_lattices(esk1_0)
& m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& ( ~ m1_subset_1(X278,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(X278,esk2_0) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X357,X358] :
( v3_struct_0(X357)
| ~ v10_lattices(X357)
| ~ l3_lattices(X357)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X358,X357)
| m1_subset_1(X358,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X357))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( m2_lattice4(X1,X2)
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X1,X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ( m1_subset_1(X2,X1)
<=> r2_hidden(X2,X1) ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ( m1_subset_1(X2,X1)
<=> v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_subset_1]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X452,X453,X454] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X452,X453)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X453,k1_zfmisc_1(X454))
| m1_subset_1(X452,X454) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
m2_lattice4(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X290,X291] :
( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X291,X290)
| r2_hidden(X291,X290)
| v1_xboole_0(X290) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(X291,X290)
| m1_subset_1(X291,X290)
| v1_xboole_0(X290) )
& ( ~ m1_subset_1(X291,X290)
| v1_xboole_0(X291)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X290) )
& ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X291)
| m1_subset_1(X291,X290)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X290) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X314] : m1_subset_1(esk5_1(X314),X314),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X3)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
m1_subset_1(esk5_1(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X1,X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(esk5_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT300+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 21:06:59 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 44.46/43.91 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 44.46/43.91 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 44.46/43.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 44.46/43.91 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 44.46/43.91 % Total time : 43.542s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------