↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.CAX-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT304+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 70.19s 23.03s
% Output   : Refutation 70.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (  55 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  392 (  54   ~;  28   |;  41   &; 251   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  106 (   3   ^;  90   !;  10   ?; 106   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(k2_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(r1_tarski_decl,type,
    r1_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(r2_hidden_decl,type,
    r2_hidden: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(r2_tarski_decl,type,
    r2_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk5_decl,type,
    sk5: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk23_decl,type,
    sk23: $i > $i ).

thf(sk24_decl,type,
    sk24: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk5_def,definition,
    ( sk5
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(sk23_def,definition,
    ( sk23
    = ( ^ [A: $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ( ~ ? [C: $i] :
                ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
                & ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
                & ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
          & ~ ? [C: $i] :
                ( ~ ? [D: $i] :
                      ( ! [E: $i] :
                          ( ( C @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) )
                         => ( D @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) ) )
                      & ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
                & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
          & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
                & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
             => ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk24_def,definition,
    ( sk24
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        @+[C: $i] :
          ( ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
          & ( B @ sk23 @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(64,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(856,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

thf(857,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[856]) ).

thf(858,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( D != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( C != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
         != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[857]) ).

thf(861,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[858]) ).

thf(865,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[861]) ).

thf(866,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[865]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(654,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(655,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[654]) ).

thf(656,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[655]) ).

thf(657,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[656]) ).

thf(658,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk5 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[657]) ).

thf(11906,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk5 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[658]) ).

thf(11919,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk5 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[866,11906]) ).

thf(11920,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk5 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[11919:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(90,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
            & ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ! [D: $i] :
                ~ ( ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( C @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) )
                     => ( D @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) ) )
                  & ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
         => ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_tarski) ).

thf(1003,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
            & ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ! [D: $i] :
                ~ ( ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( C @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) )
                     => ( D @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) ) )
                  & ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
         => ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

thf(1004,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ~ ? [C: $i] :
            ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
            & ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
      & ~ ? [C: $i] :
            ( ~ ? [D: $i] :
                  ( ! [E: $i] :
                      ( ( C @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) )
                     => ( D @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) ) )
                  & ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
            & ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
         => ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[1003]) ).

thf(1005,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( F @ r2_hidden ) )
        | ( A @ sk23 @ ( F @ r2_tarski ) )
        | ~ ( A @ sk23 @ ( F @ r1_tarski ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ ( D @ sk24 ) @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) )
        | ~ ( D @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) )
        | ~ ( A @ sk23 @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ ( D @ sk24 ) @ r2_hidden ) )
        | ~ ( A @ sk23 @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
        | ~ ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) )
        | ~ ( A @ sk23 @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      & ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1004]) ).

thf(1006,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1005]) ).

thf(248,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(1812,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[248]) ).

thf(1813,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1812]) ).

thf(8993,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1006,1813]) ).

thf(8994,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8993]) ).

thf(8995,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ sk23 @ r2_hidden ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[8994:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( D @ sk23 ))]]) ).

thf(9018,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ sk23 @ r2_hidden ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8995]) ).

thf(11366,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ sk23 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1006,9018]) ).

thf(11367,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sk23 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
     != ( B @ ( B @ sk23 @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11366]) ).

thf(11378,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk23 )
       != B )
      | ( A
       != ( B @ sk23 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11367]) ).

thf(11382,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sk23 @ sk23 )
     != A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11378]) ).

thf(12018,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( B @ sk23 @ sk23 ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk5 ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11920,11382]) ).

thf(12019,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk5 ) )
     != A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[12018:[bind(A,$thf( D @ sk23 @ sk23 )),bind(B,$thf( D ))]]) ).

thf(12472,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12019]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT304+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/5.42  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/5.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/5.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/5.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/5.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/5.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/5.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/5.42  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:37:29 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/5.43  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/6.03  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 3.45/6.70  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (661ms). 
% 3.45/6.72  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 4.22/7.11  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 4.22/7.12  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 5.41/7.43  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2951 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 7.12/7.99  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 587 axioms (removed 2364 axioms). 
% 8.62/8.55  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 9.07/8.60  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 9.07/8.61  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 70.19/23.02  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 70.19/23.03  % Time passed: 17447ms (effective reasoning time: 16302ms)
% 70.19/23.03  % Axioms used in derivation (4): t113_zfmisc_1, t115_zfmisc_1, t9_tarski, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 70.19/23.03  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 70.19/23.03  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 17447 ms resp. 16302 ms w/o parsing
% 70.72/23.09  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 70.72/23.09  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------