%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : LAT306+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:08 AM UTC 2026
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 47.88s 12.57s
% Output : Refutation 42.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 66 ( 24 unt; 0 typ; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 185 ( 86 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 437 ( 64 ~; 39 |; 41 &; 266 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 12 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 131 ( 3 ^; 114 !; 10 ?; 131 :)
% ( 0 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 4 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v1_xboole_0_decl,type,
v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).
thf(k2_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(m1_subset_1_decl,type,
m1_subset_1: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_xboole_0_decl,type,
k1_xboole_0: $i ).
thf(r1_tarski_decl,type,
r1_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).
thf(r2_hidden_decl,type,
r2_hidden: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(r2_tarski_decl,type,
r2_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk3_decl,type,
sk3: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk13_decl,type,
sk13: $i > $i ).
thf(sk70_decl,type,
sk70: $i > $i ).
thf(sk150_decl,type,
sk150: $i > $i ).
thf(sk3_def,definition,
( sk3
= ( @+[A: $i > $i > $i] :
! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
= B ) ) ) ).
thf(sk13_def,definition,
( sk13
= ( ^ [A: $i] :
@+[B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk70_def,definition,
( sk70
= ( ^ [A: $i] :
@+[B: $i] :
( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
& ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( B @ m1_subset_1 ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk150_def,definition,
( sk150
= ( ^ [A: $i] :
@+[B: $i] :
( ~ ? [C: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(62,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
<=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(859,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
thf(860,plain,
( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[859]) ).
thf(861,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
| ( D != k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
| ( C != k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
!= k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[860]) ).
thf(864,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
| ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[861]) ).
thf(868,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 )
| ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[864]) ).
thf(869,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[868]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(657,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
= ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(658,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A = B )
| ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
!= ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[657]) ).
thf(659,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A = B )
| ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
!= ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[658]) ).
thf(660,plain,
? [A: $i > $i > $i] :
! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
= B ),
inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[659]) ).
thf(661,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk3 ) )
= A ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[660]) ).
thf(6543,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk3 ) )
= A ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[661]) ).
thf(6544,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
!= ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
| ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk3 ) )
= B ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[869,6543]) ).
thf(6545,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk3 ) )
= A ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6544:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(639,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(640,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
| ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[639]) ).
thf(641,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
| ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[640]) ).
thf(394,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t136_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2547,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[394]) ).
thf(2548,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ~ ? [C: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) ) )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( D @ r1_tarski ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[2547]) ).
thf(2549,plain,
! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ sk150 @ ( E @ r2_hidden ) )
| ( A @ sk150 @ ( E @ r2_tarski ) )
| ~ ( A @ sk150 @ ( E @ r1_tarski ) ) )
& ( ( A @ sk150 @ ( D @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ r2_hidden ) )
| ~ ( A @ sk150 @ ( D @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( ( A @ sk150 @ ( C @ r2_hidden ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ r1_tarski ) )
| ~ ( A @ sk150 @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( A @ sk150 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[2548]) ).
thf(2550,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ sk150 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[2549]) ).
thf(74,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).
thf(914,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[74]) ).
thf(915,plain,
( ! [A: $i] :
( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ! [A: $i] :
( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
=> ~ ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ) ),
inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[914]) ).
thf(916,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( C = k1_xboole_0 )
| ( C @ ( C @ sk13 @ r2_hidden ) ) )
& ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
| ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[915]) ).
thf(917,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
| ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[916]) ).
thf(919,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) )
| ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[917]) ).
thf(920,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[919]) ).
thf(6333,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ sk150 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
!= ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2550,920]) ).
thf(6334,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A @ sk150 @ ( A @ r2_hidden ) )
!= ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( B @ r2_hidden ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6333]) ).
thf(6341,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ sk150 )
!= k1_xboole_0 )
| ( A != B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6334]) ).
thf(6345,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ sk150 )
!= k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6341]) ).
thf(6346,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A
!= ( B @ sk150 ) )
| ( k1_xboole_0 != k1_xboole_0 )
| ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[641,6345]) ).
thf(6347,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A
!= ( B @ sk150 ) )
| ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6346]) ).
thf(6348,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ sk150 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6347:[bind(A,$thf( C @ sk150 )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).
thf(6354,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ sk150 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6348]) ).
thf(6587,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A
!= ( B @ sk150 ) )
| ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk3 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6545,6354]) ).
thf(6588,plain,
~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk3 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6587:[bind(A,$thf( C @ sk150 )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).
thf(215,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
& ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( B @ m1_subset_1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_subset_1) ).
thf(1614,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
& ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( B @ m1_subset_1 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[215]) ).
thf(1615,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ sk70 @ v1_xboole_0 )
& ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( A @ sk70 @ m1_subset_1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1614]) ).
thf(1617,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ sk70 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[1615]) ).
thf(5287,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ sk70 @ v1_xboole_0 )
!= ( B @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
| ~ $true
| ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1617,641]) ).
thf(5288,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ sk70 @ v1_xboole_0 )
!= ( B @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
| ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5287]) ).
thf(5289,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ sk70 )
= k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5288:[bind(A,$thf( C )),bind(B,$thf( C @ sk70 ))]]) ).
thf(5306,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ sk70 )
= k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5289]) ).
thf(6627,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A
!= ( B @ sk70 ) )
| ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk3 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6545,5306]) ).
thf(6628,plain,
( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk3 ) )
= k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6627:[bind(A,$thf( C @ sk70 )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).
thf(6946,plain,
~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6588,6628]) ).
thf(54,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
<=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_xboole_0) ).
thf(820,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
thf(821,plain,
( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
& ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[820]) ).
thf(822,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
| ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) )
& ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
| ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[821]) ).
thf(824,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
| ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[822]) ).
thf(826,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
| ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[824]) ).
thf(827,plain,
k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[826]) ).
thf(6980,plain,
~ $true,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6946,827]) ).
thf(6981,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6980]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LAT306+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:43:59 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.98 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 3.20/1.67 % [INFO] Parsing done (687ms).
% 3.20/1.69 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 4.11/2.07 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 4.11/2.08 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 4.92/2.39 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2958 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 7.16/2.99 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 603 axioms (removed 2355 axioms).
% 8.76/3.56 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 9.20/3.61 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 9.20/3.61 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 47.88/12.56 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 47.88/12.56 % Time passed: 12030ms (effective reasoning time: 10868ms)
% 47.88/12.57 % Axioms used in derivation (7): t113_zfmisc_1, d5_xboole_0, t115_zfmisc_1, d1_xboole_0, t136_zfmisc_1, t6_boole, rc2_subset_1
% 47.88/12.57 % No. of inferences in proof: 62
% 47.88/12.57 % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 12030 ms resp. 10868 ms w/o parsing
% 42.59/12.63 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 42.59/12.63 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------