↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.CAX-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT307+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 102.90s 25.65s
% Output   : Refutation 102.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  56 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  155 (  22   ~;  20   |;   7   &;  94   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0   ^;  52   !;   2   ?;  55   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).

thf(k2_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_decl,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(k1_zfmisc_1_decl,type,
    k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).

thf(sk47_decl,type,
    sk47: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk47_def,definition,
    ( sk47
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(70,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(984,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

thf(985,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[984]) ).

thf(986,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( D != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( ( D @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( C != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( B = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
         != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[985]) ).

thf(989,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[986]) ).

thf(993,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[989]) ).

thf(994,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[993]) ).

thf(105,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(1182,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
        = ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[105]) ).

thf(1183,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1182]) ).

thf(1184,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1183]) ).

thf(1185,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( C @ A ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[1184]) ).

thf(1186,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk47 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1185]) ).

thf(20620,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) @ ( B @ sk47 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1186]) ).

thf(20621,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( A @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ sk47 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[994,20620]) ).

thf(20622,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk47 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[20621:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(278,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_subset_1) ).

thf(2029,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[278]) ).

thf(2030,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] : ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[2029]) ).

thf(2031,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ k1_zfmisc_1 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[2030]) ).

thf(20894,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( B @ k1_zfmisc_1 ) )
      | ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk47 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20622,2031]) ).

thf(20895,plain,
    ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk47 ) @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[20894:[bind(A,$thf( C @ k1_zfmisc_1 )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(20921,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( B @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) ) )
      | ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk47 ) )
        = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20622,994]) ).

thf(20922,plain,
    ( ( k1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_xboole_0 @ sk47 ) )
    = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[20921:[bind(A,$thf( k1_xboole_0 @ ( C @ k2_zfmisc_1 ) )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(22073,plain,
    ~ ( k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[20895,20922]) ).

thf(59,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_xboole_0) ).

thf(929,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

thf(930,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[929]) ).

thf(931,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ v1_xboole_0 )
        | ( B != k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ~ ( A @ v1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[930]) ).

thf(933,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[931]) ).

thf(935,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ v1_xboole_0 )
      | ( A != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[933]) ).

thf(936,plain,
    k1_xboole_0 @ v1_xboole_0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[935]) ).

thf(22159,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[22073,936]) ).

thf(22160,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[22159]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT307+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 20:41:02 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 3.71/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (718ms). 
% 3.71/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 4.41/2.13  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 4.41/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 5.62/2.46  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2960 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 8.09/3.10  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 652 axioms (removed 2308 axioms). 
% 10.00/3.70  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 10.00/3.75  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 10.00/3.76  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 102.90/25.64  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 102.90/25.65  % Time passed: 25113ms (effective reasoning time: 23911ms)
% 102.90/25.65  % Axioms used in derivation (4): t113_zfmisc_1, t115_zfmisc_1, fc1_subset_1, d5_xboole_0
% 102.90/25.65  % No. of inferences in proof: 34
% 102.90/25.65  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 25113 ms resp. 23911 ms w/o parsing
% 102.90/25.70  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 102.90/25.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------