↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LAT382+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:47:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 28.09s 13.43s
% Output   : Refutation 28.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  210 (  23 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  554 (  78   ~;  70   |;  45   &; 339   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   2   ^;  49   !;   0   ?;  53   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(aSet0_decl,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

thf(aElementOf0_decl,type,
    aElementOf0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aLowerBoundOfIn0_decl,type,
    aLowerBoundOfIn0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sdtlseqdt0_decl,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aInfimumOfIn0_decl,type,
    aInfimumOfIn0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(xu_decl,type,
    xu: $i ).

thf(xv_decl,type,
    xv: $i ).

thf(aElement0_decl,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

thf(xS_decl,type,
    xS: $i ).

thf(xT_decl,type,
    xT: $i ).

thf(sk7_decl,type,
    sk7: $i > $i ).

thf(sk8_decl,type,
    sk8: $i > $i ).

thf(sk7_def,definition,
    ( sk7
    = ( ^ [A: $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk8_def,definition,
    ( sk8
    = ( ^ [A: $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
            & ( xT @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
       => ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xS @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
            & ( xT @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
       => ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xS @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xu @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__792) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
            & ( xT @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
       => ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xS @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( xS @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
            & ( xT @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
       => ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xS @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xu @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(95,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xv @ ( D @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( D @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( xv @ ( D @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( D @ sk8 @ ( D @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( D @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xv @ ( D @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ( xS @ ( D @ sk8 @ aElementOf0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( D @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xS @ ( C @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aInfimumOfIn0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xu @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( B @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( xu @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( B @ sk7 @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xu @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ( xS @ ( B @ sk7 @ aElementOf0 ) )
        | ~ ( xT @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ ( xu @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xS @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) )
      & ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[94]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ aSet0 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
         => ( B @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mEOfElem) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ aSet0 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
         => ( B @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[78]) ).

thf(6584,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[107,79]) ).

thf(6585,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xu @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6584]) ).

thf(6586,plain,
    ( ( xu @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xT @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6585:[bind(A,$thf( xT )),bind(B,$thf( xu ))]]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    xT @ aSet0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__773) ).

thf(82,plain,
    xT @ aSet0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ aElement0 )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
     => ( ( ( A @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mASymm) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ aElement0 )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
     => ( ( ( A @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[66]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[67]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    xu = xv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    xu != xv,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    xu != xv,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    xv != xu,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(3795,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A != xv )
      | ( B != xu )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[68,21]) ).

thf(3796,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != xu )
      | ~ ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( xv @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[3795:[bind(A,$thf( xv ))]]) ).

thf(4931,plain,
    ( ~ ( xv @ ( xu @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
    | ~ ( xu @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
    | ~ ( xu @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xv @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[3796]) ).

thf(106,plain,
    xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(112,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[100]) ).

thf(1233,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[106,112]) ).

thf(1234,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xu @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ( xv @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1233]) ).

thf(1235,plain,
    xv @ ( xu @ sdtlseqdt0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1234:[bind(A,$thf( xu ))]]) ).

thf(104,plain,
    xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[102]) ).

thf(1035,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[104,110]) ).

thf(1036,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xS @ ( xv @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xT @ ( xS @ ( A @ aLowerBoundOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ( xu @ ( A @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1035]) ).

thf(1037,plain,
    xu @ ( xv @ sdtlseqdt0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1036:[bind(A,$thf( xv ))]]) ).

thf(5045,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ~ $true
    | ~ ( xu @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xv @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[4931,1235,1037]) ).

thf(5046,plain,
    ( ~ ( xu @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xv @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5045]) ).

thf(5067,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( xv @ aElement0 )
     != ( xu @ aElement0 ) )
    | ~ ( xu @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[5046]) ).

thf(5068,plain,
    ( ( ( xv @ aElement0 )
     != ( xu @ aElement0 ) )
    | ~ ( xu @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5067]) ).

thf(105,plain,
    xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(6566,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[105,79]) ).

thf(6567,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xT @ ( xv @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( B @ aElement0 )
      | ~ ( A @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6566]) ).

thf(6568,plain,
    ( ( xv @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xT @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[6567:[bind(A,$thf( xT )),bind(B,$thf( xv ))]]) ).

thf(6598,plain,
    ( ( xv @ aElement0 )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6568,82]) ).

thf(6599,plain,
    xv @ aElement0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6598]) ).

thf(6600,plain,
    ( ~ ( xu @ aElement0 )
    | ~ ( xu @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[5068,6599]) ).

thf(6601,plain,
    ~ ( xu @ aElement0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6600]) ).

thf(6723,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6586,82,6601]) ).

thf(6724,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6723]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LAT382+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/5.66  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.66  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.66  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.66  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.66  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.66  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.66  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/5.66  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:38:23 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.66  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/5.66  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/6.27  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.58/6.59  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (312ms). 
% 1.84/6.61  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.79/7.18  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.79/7.19  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.88/7.24  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.88/7.25  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.88/7.26  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.88/7.27  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.88/7.27  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.88/7.28  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.11/7.31  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 17 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.11/7.38  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 17 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.11/7.39  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.11/7.40  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.33/7.40  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.33/7.40  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.33/7.40  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.33/7.41  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.33/7.42  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 3.33/7.43  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.33/7.43  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 28.09/13.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 28.09/13.43  % Time passed: 7631ms (effective reasoning time: 6807ms)
% 28.09/13.43  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 28.09/13.43  % Axioms used in derivation (4): m__792, mEOfElem, m__773, mASymm
% 28.09/13.43  % No. of inferences in proof: 49
% 28.09/13.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 7631 ms resp. 6807 ms w/o parsing
% 28.09/13.49  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 28.09/13.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------