%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : LAT396-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:52:00 EDT 2022 % Result : Satisfiable 11.01s 1.76s % Output : CNFRefutation 11.01s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.11 % Problem : LAT396-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 21:20:37 EDT 2022 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.11/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.11/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d % 0.11/0.36 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. % 0.11/0.36 # % 0.11/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.11/0.36 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11 % 0.11/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.11/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.11/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.11/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.11/0.36 # No conjectures after preprocessing. Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive. % 0.11/0.36 # No conjectures. % 0.11/0.36 # There are 11 start rule candidates: % 0.11/0.36 # Found 10 unit axioms. % 0.11/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.11/0.36 # 11 start rule tableaux created. % 0.11/0.36 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.11/0.36 # 10 unit axiom clauses % 0.11/0.36 % 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 9.76/1.63 # Creating equality axioms % 9.76/1.63 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 9.76/1.64 # Creating equality axioms % 9.76/1.64 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 9.76/1.65 # Creating equality axioms % 9.76/1.65 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 10.42/1.68 # Creating equality axioms % 10.42/1.68 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 11.01/1.76 # 14567 Satisfiable branch % 11.01/1.76 # Satisfiable branch found. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 11.01/1.76 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 11.01/1.76 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 11.01/1.76 # Begin clausification derivation % 11.01/1.76 % 11.01/1.76 # End clausification derivation % 11.01/1.76 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(X1,X1)=X1)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(X1,X1)=X1)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (meet(X1,complement(X1))=zero)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (join(X1,complement(X1))=one)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (complement(X1)=X2|meet(X1,X2)!=zero|join(X1,X2)!=one)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X4=X4)). % 11.01/1.76 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 11.01/1.76 # Begin printing tableau % 11.01/1.76 # Found 6 steps % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (zero=zero), inference(start_rule)). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (zero=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_43])). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (meet(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (meet(zero,meet(zero,zero))=meet(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (meet(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])). % 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (meet(zero,meet(zero,zero))=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])). % 11.01/1.76 # End printing tableau % 11.01/1.76 # SZS output end % 11.01/1.76 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 11.01/1.76 # 14565 Satisfiable branch % 11.01/1.76 # Satisfiable branch found. % 11.01/1.76 # Child (14567) has found a proof. % 11.01/1.76 % 11.01/1.76 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 11.01/1.76 # Proof search is over... % 11.01/1.76 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------