↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : LCL007-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:08:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.79s 1.11s
% Output   : Proof 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(ec_4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X1,X0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ec_4) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,ec_4]) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(ec_5,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2),equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ec_5) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_ec_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_2) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,ec_5,prove_ec_2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL007-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 17:54:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Input Clauses:
% 0.79/1.11  % 1:3:2:INP:TopTop: is_a_theorem(equivalent(x0,x1)),is_a_theorem(x0) -> is_a_theorem(x1)
% 0.79/1.11  % 2:1:2:INP:TopTop:  -> is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(x0,x1),equivalent(x1,x0)))
% 0.79/1.11  % 3:1:3:INP:TopTopTop:  -> is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(x0,x1),x2),equivalent(x0,equivalent(x1,x2))))
% 0.79/1.11  % 4:1:0:INP:: is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))) -> 
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Predicates: is_a_theorem 
% 0.79/1.11  % Fol Constants: a b c 
% 0.79/1.11  % Fol Functions: equivalent 
% 0.79/1.11  % Problem Properties:
% 0.79/1.11  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is non-linear. 
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.79/1.11  % 1:3:2:INP:TopTop: is_a_theorem(equivalent(x0,x1)),is_a_theorem(x0) -> is_a_theorem(x1)
% 0.79/1.11  % 2:1:2:INP:TopTop:  -> is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(x0,x1),equivalent(x1,x0)))
% 0.79/1.11  % 3:1:3:INP:TopTopTop:  -> is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(x0,x1),x2),equivalent(x0,equivalent(x1,x2))))
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.79/1.11  % 4:1:0:INP:: is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))) -> 
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 31 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lcl ===
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.79/1.11  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of learned clauses: 5
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of propagations: 228
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of decisions: 121
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of resolutions: 9
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of condensations: 0
% 0.79/1.11  % Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.79/1.11  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.79/1.11  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % Needed:       0:00:00.76
% 0.79/1.11  
% 0.79/1.11  % ###
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Memory demanded:  8270 KBytes
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Memory freed:     8270 KBytes
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.79/1.11  % ### Pages allocated:  1055 Pages
% 0.79/1.11  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------