↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  16   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(yql,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',yql) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[yql]) ).

fof(prove_ec_5,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_5) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_ec_5]) ).

cnf(c_303,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B))),equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_303,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_304,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(C,D))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_304,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_305,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_305,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_306,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_306,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,E),equivalent(C,D)))),equivalent(equivalent(B,E),A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_308,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,A),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),A),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_308,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_309,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,A),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,A)),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_310,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_310,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_311,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(C,D))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(B,E),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,E),equivalent(C,D))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_301,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_312,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_302,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/10.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/10.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:42:52 UTC 2026
% 0.08/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/10.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/10.38  % Process 1282673 was started by sandbox on n013,
% 0.08/10.38  % Fri Sep 25 21:42:52 2026
% 0.08/10.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/10.39  
% 0.08/10.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/10.41  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.14/10.41  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.14/10.41  % Maximum clause weight is 90.000.
% 0.14/10.41  % Given clauses 30.
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------