↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL017-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:39:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.05s 1.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(pyo,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),X3),equivalent(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pyo) ).

cnf(prove_yro,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(c,b),a)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_yro) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    condensed_detachment ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),X3),equivalent(X2,X1))),
    pyo ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3)),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,equivalent(X1,equivalent(X3,X2)))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,equivalent(X2,X1)))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X1,X2)),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3)),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),X1))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X2,X3))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X3))),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(c,b),a)))),
    prove_yro ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL017-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:52:14 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 2.05/1.98  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 2.05/1.98  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/1.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/1.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.05/1.99  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------