↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL018-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 41.10s 10.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 41.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  33   ~;  31   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (   0 sgn  88   !;   0   ?;  83   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),X1),equivalent(X2,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pym) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_pyo) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),X1),equivalent(X2,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0),X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0),X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0),X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),equivalent(X2,X3)),X1))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_98]) ).

tcf(c_210,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_262,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_399,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_500,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X0)),X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_399,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_591,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X0)),X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_595,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2),X1),X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_618,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_591,c_262]) ).

tcf(c_1292,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2),X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_618,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_1417,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1292,c_500]) ).

tcf(c_1422,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1292,c_595]) ).

tcf(c_1477,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1422,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_1506,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2),X1)),X2)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1477,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_3558,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X0)),X2),X1))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1506,c_1292]) ).

tcf(c_4225,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),X1),X0),X2)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3558,c_1477]) ).

tcf(c_4455,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),equivalent(X2,X1)),X2))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4225,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_7755,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X0,X1)),X2))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1417,c_4455]) ).

tcf(c_9037,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X2,X0)),X1),X2)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7755,c_1477]) ).

tcf(c_11406,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X0)),equivalent(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9037,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_16711,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X0,X2)),X2))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11406,c_1417]) ).

tcf(c_22223,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),X2),equivalent(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16711,c_1477]) ).

tcf(c_25967,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_22223]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL018-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:37:05 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.33  % Proving...
% 41.10/10.68  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 41.10/10.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------  iProver source info
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 41.10/10.68  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 41.10/10.68  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e % 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Preprocessing...
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Proving...
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % 
% 41.10/10.68  % clauses                               3
% 41.10/10.68  % conjectures                           1
% 41.10/10.68  % EPR                                   0
% 41.10/10.68  % Horn                                  3
% 41.10/10.68  % unary                                 2
% 41.10/10.68  % binary                                0
% 41.10/10.68  % lits                                  5
% 41.10/10.68  % lits eq                               0
% 41.10/10.68  % fd_pure                               0
% 41.10/10.68  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 41.10/10.68  % fd_cond                               0
% 41.10/10.68  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 41.10/10.68  % AC symbols                            0
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ 
% 41.10/10.68  % Current options:
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % ------ Proving...
% 41.10/10.68  % 
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 41.10/10.68  
% 41.10/10.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------